Re: [SED-ML-discuss] more schema updates

[Nicolas Le n. <le...@eb...>]

Actually I was wrong, we should not do that. Names are optional. And we do 
not want to put mandatory names just on dataGenerators, because in the 
future, we will most probably have intermediate generator used to produce 
complex data.

We need a mandatory attribute.

On 09/06/10 08:37, Nicolas Le novère wrote:
> On 08/06/10 19:07, Frank Bergmann wrote:
>> Thanks for following up on this ... here some comments:
>>
>>> - included a *label *attribute in each the curve, surface and dataset
>>> elements (optional)
>>
>> I'm still not sure why we had to have a label attribute. What is the added
>> advantage of using it? Why could we not just use the name property of the
>> data generator?
>
> We could. But we must put it explicitely in the spec then. There must be an
> identification of the vectors.
>
>


-- 
Nicolas LE NOVERE, Computational Neurobiology, EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust
Genome Campus, Hinxton CB101SD UK, Mob:+447833147074, Tel:+441223494521
Fax:468,Skype:n.lenovere,AIM:nlenovere,MSN:nle...@ho...(NOT email)
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov/, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/compneur/, @lenovere