From: Nicolas Le n. <le...@eb...> - 2010-06-09 07:43:45
|
On 08/06/10 19:07, Frank Bergmann wrote: > I'm still missing the most important one ... the fix to the ChangeXML ... > implementing adding of elements by having to replace an existing model > element with itself and another one is just plain wrong! It is not a "fix", and replacing the containing element is not "plain wrong". It is just verbose. But we are talking of computers here. verbosity is not the main concern. Unambiguity is. We may want to separate the semantics of the XPath for addition and removal. But not doing so does not break SED-ML. > It would be great > to have it separated out into: > AddXML > ChangeXML > RemoveXML > > Or at least have an operation flag on the ChangeXML element! I would put a flag then, please. -- Nicolas LE NOVERE, Computational Neurobiology, EMBL-EBI, Wellcome-Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB101SD UK, Mob:+447833147074, Tel:+441223494521 Fax:468,Skype:n.lenovere,AIM:nlenovere,MSN:nle...@ho...(NOT email) http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~lenov/, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/compneur/, @lenovere |