From: Frank T. B. <fbergman@u.washington.edu> - 2010-06-08 17:17:40
|
Hello again ... > -----Original Message----- > From: Dagmar Waltemath [mailto:dag...@un...] > > Connected to that I do have 2 questions: > > 1) My notes from Seattle say that we were in favour of a urn scheme > like > > <variable symbol="urn:sedml:symbol:time" [..] /> for time. > > I could not remember what the reason was not to use simple reserved > names, e.g. reserving the string "time" for the notion of time (if used > with the symbol attribute)? > > <variable symbol="time" [..] /> > in the end what the string is does not matter much, however it seemed at the time that the URN scheme was preferred ... but careful, try not to bind the definition for 'time' to a specific sbml level and version ... thanks > > > 2) Second question I'd have is which symbols, apart from time, would > you > like to use in SED-ML L1V1? > for l1v1 i think that was supposed to be it. best Frank > Cheers, > Dagmar > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > SED-ML-discuss mailing list > SED...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sed-ml-discuss |