Re: [Miase-discuss] MIASE paper

[Dagmar K. <da...@eb...>]

Hej David,


David Nickerson wrote:
>> One more thing here, we should not enforce the use of MIRIAM. We should only
>> recommend people to refer to MIRIAM compliant models, if possible.
>>     
>
> yeah, I was really just thinking that since MIRIAM addresses
> availability, licensing, etc so we can leave it up to MIRIAM and not
> need to address it in MIASE. Is it really that bad to enforce the use
> of MIRIAM compliant model descriptions?
>   

I think it is. But we could discuss that on the list if other people do 
agree with you :-)

>> 4) The Repressilator example
>> You suggested to do "a cell physiology type example as something more
>> familiar to the CellML community. Perhaps something along the lines of
>> calculating APDs in a parameter scan?"
>> The more example we have, the better. And the more diverse the even more
>> better.
>> So, if you volunteer to set up the example :-) ... I would not say no :-)
>> (BTW, Viji is currently doing an example that includes post-processing of
>> the output. )
>>     
>
> cool. I'm kind of hoping someone might volunteer :) I think the
> current example plus Viji's one would be sufficient, but it would be
> nice to have more. If I get a chance I'll give it a try.
>   

I just left this comment in here as a reminder, in case you want to do 
the example.

Dagmar