From: Michael H. <mh...@ca...> - 2009-01-23 08:33:28
|
fbergman> but but ... who was talking about XPath 2.0 fbergman> ... really Xpath 1.0 is not all bad, it is fbergman> available on (almost) all (windows) machines and fbergman> just works. ... and apparently fatally flawed for this application, if it can't deal with default namespaces ... I didn't check: are there no xpath 2.0 implementations? That would be a bit of a show-stopper, I agree. MH |