From: Frank B. <fbergman@u.washington.edu> - 2009-01-23 03:21:23
|
Hello Mike & all, On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:33 PM, Michael Hucka wrote: > Hi Richard, > > It's exciting to see work restarting on miase and sed-ml. I > was just thinking that working on this (or whatever is not > resolved by that time) would be an excellent topic for the > April super-workshop in Auckland. Will you (and others on > this list) be attending that meeting? If not, can I > convince you to go? :-) I'll be there ... > > > What would be ideal to make this a productive MIASE meeting > is to identify 1-2 concrete goal(s). Perhaps we can > collectively discuss what those objectives should be? > I was sort of hoping for it to be like one of the early SBML hackathon. It would be great if the groups could bring their MIASE prototypes and we could share some files and compare results. The next thing would be to broaden the scope to maybe include something else but uniform time courses. The combination of MIASE description and dynamic model / data needs to be clarified. As i proposed last year an archive format would be ideal to keep all data together, a registered MIME extension would help all of us. Again think of it not so much as a zip file, that users of our software would have to keep in sync with the description, but rather as a miase file, that only software handles. suddenly there is no hassle for the users anymore. Even software has no problems, as at the moment of writing the file, it is precisely clear for which model to save what data and experiment description. cheers Frank > MH > > -- > Mike Hucka, mh...@ca..., http://sbml.org > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Miase-discuss mailing list > Mia...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miase-discuss |