Re: [securityfilter-devel] transport-guarantee secure port configuration

[Torgeir V. <to...@po...>]

On 6 Nov 2007, at 22:59, Christopher Schultz wrote:

> On the one hand, it's nice to have configuration in a single place  
> (like
> securityfilter-config.xml). On the other hand, that file should be as
> much like the deployment descriptor's security-constraint sections as
> possible.
>
> I wondered if anyone had any thoughts on which strategy would be best.
> I'm leaning toward #3.


+1. I'd go for #3 as well. Setting the SL port to something else than  
443 I'd say would happen very rarely.

-- 
Torgeir Veimo
to...@po...