|
From: Andrew v. d. S. <aj...@gr...> - 2002-01-17 21:52:40
|
My personal interest is that RFB 3.x is not securable, but if you look at the draft, it adds a whole raft of things that needed to be added for the longest time. It's basically a NG discussion list, not just about security. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: sec...@li... [mailto:sec...@li...] On Behalf Of Michael Ossmann Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 5:44 AM To: sec...@li... Subject: Re: [rfbhackers] Protocol Hackers On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Erlichmen, Shay wrote: > > Is this list will be oriented on securing the RFB protocol only?, or > for general purpose design of the TNG protocol. Andrew's primary focus happens to be on security, but the list is dedicated to the future of the protocol as a whole and the eventual standardization of RFB 4.0. Please join us if you have an interest in RFB. The more, the merrier! -- Mike Ossmann, Tarantella/UNIX Engineer/Instructor Alternative Technology, Inc. http://www.alttech.com/ _______________________________________________ Securevnc-rfbhackers mailing list Sec...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/securevnc-rfbhackers |