RE: [rfbhackers] Protocol Hackers

[Andrew v. d. S. <aj...@gr...>]

My personal interest is that RFB 3.x is not securable, but if you look
at the draft, it adds a whole raft of things that needed to be added for
the longest time. It's basically a NG discussion list, not just about
security.

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: sec...@li...
[mailto:sec...@li...] On Behalf Of
Michael Ossmann
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 5:44 AM
To: sec...@li...
Subject: Re: [rfbhackers] Protocol Hackers


On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Erlichmen, Shay wrote:
> 
> Is this list will be oriented on securing the RFB protocol only?, or 
> for general purpose design of the TNG protocol.

Andrew's primary focus happens to be on security, but the list is
dedicated to the future of the protocol as a whole and the eventual
standardization of RFB 4.0.  Please join us if you have an interest in
RFB.  The more, the merrier!

-- 
Mike Ossmann, Tarantella/UNIX Engineer/Instructor
Alternative Technology, Inc.  http://www.alttech.com/

_______________________________________________
Securevnc-rfbhackers mailing list
Sec...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/securevnc-rfbhackers