Re: [securenfs-devel] Fixed timings in thread-test client

[Nathan Y. <na...@yo...>]

> Whoops, I should have seen this earlier.  Of course this list
> is not in order of the clients as they are forked, it is in the
> order of clients as they finish!  So you should always see better
> timings for the first ones!  :)

Doh! Good catch... sometimes its the simple things ;-)

Perhaps we should have each fork also output its relative position to
the others (via a counter), or perhaps its token or something - just so
we can identify trends (if there are any) relating to order of
connection etc.

Nate