Re: [securenfs-devel] Forums - and gettings snfsd compiling

[David W. <wo...@pl...>]

Nathan Yocom wrote:
> 2 quick things:
> 
> 1. Email lists are fine by me, but a topic oriented discussion forum may
> be just as productive - what do you guys think? Myself, email is easiest
> to manage, but we could do a private forum on sourceforge, or set one up
> on shemp in the snfs.cs.plu.edu area...
> 

Well, forums are nice because there is better threading support.  I'd
suggest a private forum on sourceforge, if we do it on shemp we
might as well use phorum that I have already set up (rather than
installing YAF (Yet Another Forum).  I'd actually rather use a forum
because I don't like using webmail from off campus (and I don't want
to send my IMAP password in plain text!) .



> 2. Anyone want to volunteer to get the framed snfsd module compiling
> (resolve circular .h stuff, correct declaration of the STL stuff, etc) ?
> :-) Its been too long since I have dealt with such issues so I am slowly
> becoming familiar again.


I can do this.  I'll look at it today.  I've had lots of practice
lately.

Dave


> 
> Later!
> Nate
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> securenfs-devel mailing list
> sec...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/securenfs-devel



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage correspondence using GnuPG/OpenPGP encryption.
My public key:  http://www.cs.plu.edu/~dwolff/pgpkey.txt