Thread: [Secureideas-base-devel] BASE 1.3.5 (marie)
Brought to you by:
secureideas,
sinukas
From: Kevin J. <kjo...@se...> - 2006-11-28 12:15:16
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
I just wanted to let everyone know that 1.3.5 (marie) is now in cvs for us to start building.... I would like to make some big fixes here including updating the interface some.... I am thinking that this should help in the work toward 2.x. On that note, what happened to the new schema being checked into CVS? Thanks Kevin Kevin Johnson GCIA, GCIH, CISSP, CEH Principal Consultant Secure Ideas http://www.secureideas.net |
From: GaRaGeD S. <ga...@gm...> - 2006-11-28 14:28:02
|
On 11/28/06, Kevin Johnson <kjo...@se...> wrote: > > I just wanted to let everyone know that 1.3.5 (marie) is now in cvs for us > to start building.... I would like to make some big fixes here including > updating the interface some.... > I am thinking that this should help in the work toward 2.x. > > On that note, what happened to the new schema being checked into CVS? > > Thanks > Kevin > Are we going to make use of template of some sort ? and some kind of "ajax" features ? I would love to make use of smarty and dojo, but I'm open to what the community chooses :), I would like to see base make the step into the commercial grade open source projects :), is great, but time is taking on us. Max -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GS/S d- s: a-29 C++(+++) ULAHI+++ P+ L++>+++ E--- W++ N* o-- K- w++++ O- M-- V-- PS+ PE Y-- PGP++ t- 5- X+ R tv++ b+ DI+++ D- G++ e++ h+ r+ z** ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: Kevin J. <kjo...@se...> - 2006-11-29 01:52:30
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:27 AM, GaRaGeD Style wrote: > > Are we going to make use of template of some sort ? and some kind > of "ajax" features ? I would love to make use of smarty and dojo, > but I'm open to what the community chooses :), I would like to see > base make the step into the commercial grade open source > projects :), is great, but time is taking on us. > > Max > I would like to use a templating system but have not decided on which one. I have looked at smarty a little but never heard of dojo? I also like the idea of AJAX and think that the design we have where the server client are different will allow us to support an AJAX client. Kevin Kevin Johnson GCIA, GCIH, CISSP, CEH Principal Consultant Secure Ideas |
From: Tim R. <cap...@gm...> - 2006-11-29 02:08:28
|
Kevin Johnson wrote: > On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:27 AM, GaRaGeD Style wrote: >> >> Are we going to make use of template of some sort ? and some kind of >> "ajax" features ? I would love to make use of smarty and dojo, but I'm >> open to what the community chooses :), I would like to see base make >> the step into the commercial grade open source projects :), is great, >> but time is taking on us. >> >> Max >> > > I would like to use a templating system but have not decided on which > one. I have looked at smarty a little > but never heard of dojo? I also like the idea of AJAX and think that > the design we have where the server > client are different will allow us to support an AJAX client. > > Kevin > > Kevin Johnson GCIA, GCIH, CISSP, CEH > Principal Consultant > Secure Ideas > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Secureideas-base-devel mailing list > Sec...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/secureideas-base-devel I cant speak for dojo because I havent used it, but I have used (and continue to use) a package called scriptaculous which is excellent imho for the AJAX stuff I write. It packages the prototype.js library with it so you get that great library too. Most recently I used scriptaculous in a tool called nessquik that I wrote. http://home.fnal.gov/~tarupp/nessquik/screenshots-2.0.html screenshots dont really do it justice, but in any case, if you're evaluating ajax packages, I'd vouch for scriptaculous based on my own experience. -Tim |
From: Kevin J. <kjo...@se...> - 2006-11-29 02:17:51
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Tim Rupp wrote: > Kevin Johnson wrote: >> >> I would like to use a templating system but have not decided on which >> one. I have looked at smarty a little >> but never heard of dojo? I also like the idea of AJAX and think that >> the design we have where the server >> client are different will allow us to support an AJAX client. > > I cant speak for dojo because I havent used it, but I have used (and > continue to use) a package called scriptaculous which is excellent > imho > for the AJAX stuff I write. > > It packages the prototype.js library with it so you get that great > library too. Most recently I used scriptaculous in a tool called > nessquik that I wrote. > > http://home.fnal.gov/~tarupp/nessquik/screenshots-2.0.html > > screenshots dont really do it justice, but in any case, if you're > evaluating ajax packages, I'd vouch for scriptaculous based on my own > experience. > > -Tim First, I would like to say great work on nessquik, I am recommending it to someone right now. Second, would you mind sending a link to the scriptaculous info? Thanks Kevin Kevin Johnson GCIA, GCIH, CISSP, CEH Principal Consultant Secure Ideas |
From: Tim R. <cap...@gm...> - 2006-11-29 02:22:12
|
Kevin Johnson wrote: > On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Tim Rupp wrote: >> Kevin Johnson wrote: >>> >>> I would like to use a templating system but have not decided on which >>> one. I have looked at smarty a little >>> but never heard of dojo? I also like the idea of AJAX and think that >>> the design we have where the server >>> client are different will allow us to support an AJAX client. >> >> I cant speak for dojo because I havent used it, but I have used (and >> continue to use) a package called scriptaculous which is excellent imho >> for the AJAX stuff I write. >> >> It packages the prototype.js library with it so you get that great >> library too. Most recently I used scriptaculous in a tool called >> nessquik that I wrote. >> >> http://home.fnal.gov/~tarupp/nessquik/screenshots-2.0.html >> >> screenshots dont really do it justice, but in any case, if you're >> evaluating ajax packages, I'd vouch for scriptaculous based on my own >> experience. >> >> -Tim > > First, I would like to say great work on nessquik, I am recommending it to > someone right now. > > Second, would you mind sending a link to the scriptaculous info? > > Thanks > Kevin > > Kevin Johnson GCIA, GCIH, CISSP, CEH > Principal Consultant > Secure Ideas > > > yep, here's the site http://script.aculo.us/ and their wiki with the documentation http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/ Note that despite the fact that they mention rails alot, that's only because the original usage for it was in rails. Trust me it works with other languages, as all it is is javascript. -Tim |
From: GaRaGeD S. <ga...@gm...> - 2006-11-29 13:53:39
|
http://dojotoolkit.org Just to make justice :), scriptaculous is great too, but dojo is my prefered option, and is being used by big projects. Search for a review of ajax/js toolkits, both of them will be on top every time. As for the templating system, smarty is what I have used the most, but we could go with pears standard, but smarty is robust, old enough, has cache, and quite popular. Please try to take the desicion soon, I made a demo of the templating posibility with smarty a few months ago, I can start working with real stuff and commit to CVS in the next days if we decide which templating system we will use. This part is really important for base, there is not much room for improvements in logic and presentation without it. good day kids ! Max -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GS/S d- s: a-29 C++(+++) ULAHI+++ P+ L++>+++ E--- W++ N* o-- K- w++++ O- M-- V-- PS+ PE Y-- PGP++ t- 5- X+ R tv++ b+ DI+++ D- G++ e++ h+ r+ z** ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: Kevin J. <kjo...@se...> - 2006-11-30 01:36:02
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On Nov 29, 2006, at 8:53 AM, GaRaGeD Style wrote: > http://dojotoolkit.org > > Just to make justice :), scriptaculous is great too, but dojo is my > prefered option, and is being used by big projects. Search for a > review of ajax/js toolkits, both of them will be on top every time. > Dojo looks nice. Any other input group? > As for the templating system, smarty is what I have used the most, > but we could go with pears standard, but smarty is robust, old > enough, has cache, and quite popular. I agree that smarty is a good choice. I have never used it, but should be able to get up to speed pretty quick. I hope. ; ) > > Please try to take the desicion soon, I made a demo of the > templating posibility with smarty a few months ago, I can start > working with real stuff and commit to CVS in the next days if we > decide which templating system we will use. This part is really > important for base, there is not much room for improvements in > logic and presentation without it. I think that our next step needs to be to finalize the schema and make sure we all understand how the system needs to be updated. Since we are going to rewrite, lets plan well. I don't have a problem with you checking some code for the smarty stuff into the base project under CVS. The base project will be where 2.x goes. Currently there are placeholder files except for the schema that Axton is going to check in for us to try out. > > good day kids ! > Max > I will try to get a detailed idea map drafted to the group tonight or tomorrow.... Kevin Kevin Johnson GCIA, GCIH, CISSP, CEH Principal Consultant Secure Ideas |
From: Tim R. <cap...@gm...> - 2006-11-29 23:14:49
|
GaRaGeD Style wrote: > http://dojotoolkit.org > > Just to make justice :), scriptaculous is great too, but dojo is my > prefered option, and is being used by big projects. Search for a review > of ajax/js toolkits, both of them will be on top every time. > > As for the templating system, smarty is what I have used the most, but > we could go with pears standard, but smarty is robust, old enough, has > cache, and quite popular. > > Please try to take the desicion soon, I made a demo of the templating > posibility with smarty a few months ago, I can start working with real > stuff and commit to CVS in the next days if we decide which templating > system we will use. This part is really important for base, there is not > much room for improvements in logic and presentation without it. > > good day kids ! > Max > -- > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.12 > GS/S d- s: a-29 C++(+++) ULAHI+++ P+ L++>+++ E--- W++ N* o-- K- w++++ O- > M-- V-- PS+ PE Y-- PGP++ t- 5- X+ R tv++ b+ DI+++ D- G++ e++ h+ r+ z** > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ I'd second the Smarty vote as that's been my preferred template code of choice for any and all templating I've done. -Tim |
From: Kevin J. <kjo...@se...> - 2006-11-30 01:36:55
Attachments:
PGP.sig
|
On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Tim Rupp wrote: > I'd second the Smarty vote as that's been my preferred template > code of > choice for any and all templating I've done. > > -Tim Unless someone can say why not, I think smarty is the one. Kevin Kevin Johnson GCIA, GCIH, CISSP, CEH Principal Consultant Secure Ideas |