Re: [sdljava-users] Anyone using get/setPixelDataXX()?

[Ivan Z. G. <iva...@ya...>]

Greetings,

I've changed the get/setPixelData32 methods to use int[] instead of
long[].  Please let me know if this is working properly.  I didn't have
a chance to test it...

If we find this to be good I'll adjust the other two methods in the same
way.  Also I saw one thing that could be optimized which I will also do.

So we should end up with:

    get/setPixelData8   --> byte[]
    get/setPixelData16 --> short[]
    get/setPixelData32 --> int[]

Nothing else anywhere will be affected by this.

Let me know any comments...

-Ivan/

S. Meslin-Weber wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>I'm cleaning up some code in Odonata and in the sdljava provider I've
>found that I use get/setPixelData32(long[]). Would it be possible to
>rationalise the types used for these methods? Does anyone still use
>them?
>
>long[]  64 bit colour data
>int[]   32 ...
>short[] 16 ...
>byte[]   8 ...
>
>Essentially it'd mean changing the signatures for the get/set methods to
>match the bit sizes they're operating with.
>
>I've seen the gradual move to using ByteBuffer and Buffers in general...
>Odonata intends to work with JVM versions 1.1+ so those classes wouldn't
>necessarily be available on those targets :)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Steph
>
>  
>