Re: [sdljava-users] Anyone using get/setPixelDataXX()?

[Ivan Z. G. <iva...@ya...>]

Greetings,

I have checked in code which adds the following methods to SDLSurface:

    public long[] getPixelData32()
    public int[] getPixelData16()
    public short[] getPixelData8()

    public void setPixelData32(long[] pixelData)
    public void setPixelData16(int[] pixelData)
    public void setPixelData8(short[] pixelData)

Cheers,
-Ivan/

S. Meslin-Weber wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>I'm cleaning up some code in Odonata and in the sdljava provider I've
>found that I use get/setPixelData32(long[]). Would it be possible to
>rationalise the types used for these methods? Does anyone still use
>them?
>
>long[]  64 bit colour data
>int[]   32 ...
>short[] 16 ...
>byte[]   8 ...
>
>Essentially it'd mean changing the signatures for the get/set methods to
>match the bit sizes they're operating with.
>
>I've seen the gradual move to using ByteBuffer and Buffers in general...
>Odonata intends to work with JVM versions 1.1+ so those classes wouldn't
>necessarily be available on those targets :)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Steph
>
>  
>