Re: [sdljava-users] SDLImage

[Chris D. <Des...@nt...>]

I've got a question regarding SDLImage. Is it me, or is this class 
redundant? To me, it just seems to be a factory class for SDLSurface, 
from which image surfaces can be created from filename handles (as 
strings), and it may be better to transfer the load methods back to 
SDLSurface as constructors, while keeping stub methods in SDLimage for 
backwards compatiblity. Also, perhaps filename should be an actual file 
handle type, instead of a String, from the underlying Java architecture 
(if it exists)? ;)

On the whole, however, this seems really well implemented, but I think 
you have to carry on reaching into the Java architecture for well 
defined types.

Regards,
Chris

-- 
                                                |>>>
 Dessimat0r                              /`\    |
 "We cannot turn back time, but we can      _  _|_  _
 move it forwards with our own hands."     |;|_|;|_|;|
                                           \\.    .  /
 [www:    http://codeknight.net   ]         \\:  .  /
 [e-mail: des...@nt... ]          ||: U |        /`\
 [icq:    21477909                ]          ||:.  |
 [msn:    des...@nt... ]     \,/  ||: U.|
                                             ||:   |    \,/
                                             ||: , |
     ____--`~--- '--~~__            __ ----~ -  ~`---,
-~--~                   ~---__ ,--~'                  ~~----___