Thread: [Sdlconsole-developers] automake
Brought to you by:
reflex-2000
From: reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> - 2004-03-28 13:42:57
|
Hello, It's been a long time since I made my last change. I now have some time finally :-) Actually I wanted to fix the callback problem to make it work hand in hand with c++ apps. unfortunately I am now stuck with this sucky automake. It doesn't work, it sucks.. I don't like it and.. ah yes the time i spent to make automake/autoconf work was a complete waste because in that time I could have written a nice configure script myself and also an even nicer Makefile. What do you think? Does anyone provide me with makefiles.am and configure.in for sdlconsole because I won't spend more time on it. Or should I drop it and revert back to the former Makefiles and enhance them and provide a simple script on my own? and btw.. kde3.2 and kdevelop3 rule :-) Regards Clemens |
From: Robos <ro...@mu...> - 2004-03-28 19:27:56
|
On Sun, 28.03.04, reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, Hi Clemens > It's been a long time since I made my last change. I now have some > time finally :-) Actually I wanted to fix the callback problem to > make it work hand in hand with c++ apps. > > unfortunately I am now stuck with this sucky automake. It doesn't > work, it sucks.. I don't like it and.. ah yes the time i spent to > make automake/autoconf work was a complete waste because in that > time I could have written a nice configure script myself and also > an even nicer Makefile. > > What do you think? Does anyone provide me with makefiles.am and > configure.in for sdlconsole because I won't spend more time on it. If you can get yourself to look again at it try this page here: http://tools.devchannel.org/devtoolschannel/03/11/14/1615230.shtml?tid=46 It is really short and gets you going fast and quite good. > Or should I drop it and revert back to the former Makefiles and > enhance them and provide a simple script on my own? I in my program have still my self-written configure.sh and the Makefile. But I soon intend to go over to auto* > and btw.. kde3.2 and kdevelop3 rule :-) Naa,maybe I'll try kdevelop again... Cheers Robos > Regards > Clemens > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Sdlconsole-developers mailing list > Sdl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdlconsole-developers > -- Robos - gpg --recv-keys --keyserver blackhole.pca.dfn.de 6EEADA09 It's GNU/Linux dammit! F U M $ ! |
From: reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> - 2004-03-28 19:53:27
|
Hi, nice to hear from you. :-) Am Sonntag, 28. M=E4rz 2004 21:26 schrieb Robos: > On Sun, 28.03.04, reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> wrote: > If you can get yourself to look again at it try this page here: > http://tools.devchannel.org/devtoolschannel/03/11/14/1615230.shtm >l?tid=3D46 It is really short and gets you going fast and quite > good. Yes I know all this, but this is actually not the problem. As you=20 might know SDL_console can be built with sdl_image support or=20 without. I need a conditional on this that defaults to=20 HAVE_SDL_IMAGE Secondly I need also a conditional for the example program for its=20 OpenGL Support. The problem was here that I had 3 different=20 includes that have to be checked. If one is missing I have to=20 disable OpenGL Support.=20 As you can see from the latest release I have done all this but it=20 doesn't work as expected. I don't like this because its too unclear=20 for me what happens and I also don't see why I need 4 Programs to=20 compile one little library.. Hey, this is not OpenOffice :-) Another thing: have you ever tried to update an application you just=20 downloaded off the internet with aclocal? I always get errors that=20 they were using another version of automake.. Aptitude tells me=20 that currently there are about 5 different version all incompatible=20 to each other.... this is great. I am not sure but I think one of the most complicated programs to=20 compile is MPlayer.. now go and look what configure script they=20 use :-) > > Or should I drop it and revert back to the former Makefiles and > > enhance them and provide a simple script on my own? > > I in my program have still my self-written configure.sh and the > Makefile. But I soon intend to go over to auto* why? Do you have reports that you script doesn't work everywhere? > > and btw.. kde3.2 and kdevelop3 rule :-) > > Naa,maybe I'll try kdevelop again... :-) Thanks for your opinion. I am still unsure wheter I should change to=20 my own scripts or to look at auto* again... Bye Clemens |
From: Ville R. <vil...@tu...> - 2004-03-28 21:10:17
|
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 16:42, reflex-2000 wrote: > Hello, > > It's been a long time since I made my last change. I now have some > time finally :-) Actually I wanted to fix the callback problem to > make it work hand in hand with c++ apps. Btw, i've made a c++-version of sdlconsole for my project. It's just a subset of the current features and i even broke alpha somewhere. I made a version of font with shadow so that it's readable without dark background. We are not going to develop this version of console any more because we're making a bit more complex and custom console with tabs and some other extra features. But the current c++ console is available if you think it would be of any use for sdlconsole project. Interface documentation: <http://arcade.ton.tut.fi/openbirds/doxygen/classOwnConsoleImpl.html> Screenshot: <http://arcade.ton.tut.fi/openbirds/screenshot.png> Download link: <http://arcade.ton.tut.fi/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/openbirds/src/ownconsoleimpl.cpp> -- -- Ville Ranki vil...@tu... 040-757 2533 http://www.vip.fi/~cosmo/ |