Hi, nice to hear from you. :-)
Am Sonntag, 28. M=E4rz 2004 21:26 schrieb Robos:
> On Sun, 28.03.04, reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> wrote:
> If you can get yourself to look again at it try this page here:
> http://tools.devchannel.org/devtoolschannel/03/11/14/1615230.shtm
>l?tid=3D46 It is really short and gets you going fast and quite
> good.
Yes I know all this, but this is actually not the problem. As you=20
might know SDL_console can be built with sdl_image support or=20
without. I need a conditional on this that defaults to=20
HAVE_SDL_IMAGE
Secondly I need also a conditional for the example program for its=20
OpenGL Support. The problem was here that I had 3 different=20
includes that have to be checked. If one is missing I have to=20
disable OpenGL Support.=20
As you can see from the latest release I have done all this but it=20
doesn't work as expected. I don't like this because its too unclear=20
for me what happens and I also don't see why I need 4 Programs to=20
compile one little library.. Hey, this is not OpenOffice :-)
Another thing: have you ever tried to update an application you just=20
downloaded off the internet with aclocal? I always get errors that=20
they were using another version of automake.. Aptitude tells me=20
that currently there are about 5 different version all incompatible=20
to each other.... this is great.
I am not sure but I think one of the most complicated programs to=20
compile is MPlayer.. now go and look what configure script they=20
use :-)
> > Or should I drop it and revert back to the former Makefiles and
> > enhance them and provide a simple script on my own?
>
> I in my program have still my self-written configure.sh and the
> Makefile. But I soon intend to go over to auto*
why? Do you have reports that you script doesn't work everywhere?
> > and btw.. kde3.2 and kdevelop3 rule :-)
>
> Naa,maybe I'll try kdevelop again...
:-)
Thanks for your opinion. I am still unsure wheter I should change to=20
my own scripts or to look at auto* again...
Bye
Clemens
|
