sdlconsole-developers Mailing List for SDL Console
Brought to you by:
reflex-2000
Menu
▾
▴
sdlconsole-developers — Mailing list for developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> - 2004-08-01 13:16:24
|
Thanks for using the console, its abcolutely no problem to use the console without a library. Just add the header and c files to you project and adjust your makefile and the console becomes part of your program. I have also done this more than one time in my own programs. It worked fine. Tell me if you have problems doing that. Regards Clemens Am Sonntag, 1. August 2004 01:23 schrieb Carl Dixon: > Hi, > > First of all I would like to say that SDL Console is a very nice > piece of work, so well done there. Just one question (I would > have asked on the sourceforge page but it didn't seem to be > frequently used), and forgive me if it is a stupid question, but > is it possible to use SDL console as part of my program instead > of as a library? I'm a seasoned coder, but fairly new to C++ so > I'm not sure how stupid that question was. I've taken up C++ > because I'm working on a game, but I don't want people to have to > install a load of dependencies first, and also I'm developing a > on a Mac in Project Builder so that I can make native OS X apps. > Thanks for any help in advance. Hopefully this time next year > I'll have a fine example of SDL_Console in use. If you would like > I can keep you informed on how the project goes. Everything will > be GPL-ified so you would be more than welcome to a copy of the > end result. > Cheers, > Carl. |
|
From: <ben...@id...> - 2004-05-25 09:38:00
|
Dear Open Source developer I am doing a research project on "Fun and Software Development" in which I kindly invite you to participate. You will find the online survey under http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/. The questionnaire consists of 53 questions and you will need about 15 minutes to complete it. With the FASD project (Fun and Software Development) we want to define the motivational significance of fun when software developers decide to engage in Open Source projects. What is special about our research project is that a similar survey is planned with software developers in commercial firms. This procedure allows the immediate comparison between the involved individuals and the conditions of production of these two development models. Thus we hope to obtain substantial new insights to the phenomenon of Open Source Development. With many thanks for your participation, Benno Luthiger PS: The results of the survey will be published under http://www.isu.unizh.ch/fuehrung/blprojects/FASD/. We have set up the mailing list fa...@we... for this study. Please see http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/mailinglist_en.html for registration to this mailing list. _______________________________________________________________________ Benno Luthiger Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich 8092 Zurich Mail: benno.luthiger(at)id.ethz.ch _______________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Ville R. <vil...@tu...> - 2004-03-28 21:10:17
|
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 16:42, reflex-2000 wrote: > Hello, > > It's been a long time since I made my last change. I now have some > time finally :-) Actually I wanted to fix the callback problem to > make it work hand in hand with c++ apps. Btw, i've made a c++-version of sdlconsole for my project. It's just a subset of the current features and i even broke alpha somewhere. I made a version of font with shadow so that it's readable without dark background. We are not going to develop this version of console any more because we're making a bit more complex and custom console with tabs and some other extra features. But the current c++ console is available if you think it would be of any use for sdlconsole project. Interface documentation: <http://arcade.ton.tut.fi/openbirds/doxygen/classOwnConsoleImpl.html> Screenshot: <http://arcade.ton.tut.fi/openbirds/screenshot.png> Download link: <http://arcade.ton.tut.fi/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/openbirds/src/ownconsoleimpl.cpp> -- -- Ville Ranki vil...@tu... 040-757 2533 http://www.vip.fi/~cosmo/ |
|
From: reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> - 2004-03-28 19:53:27
|
Hi, nice to hear from you. :-) Am Sonntag, 28. M=E4rz 2004 21:26 schrieb Robos: > On Sun, 28.03.04, reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> wrote: > If you can get yourself to look again at it try this page here: > http://tools.devchannel.org/devtoolschannel/03/11/14/1615230.shtm >l?tid=3D46 It is really short and gets you going fast and quite > good. Yes I know all this, but this is actually not the problem. As you=20 might know SDL_console can be built with sdl_image support or=20 without. I need a conditional on this that defaults to=20 HAVE_SDL_IMAGE Secondly I need also a conditional for the example program for its=20 OpenGL Support. The problem was here that I had 3 different=20 includes that have to be checked. If one is missing I have to=20 disable OpenGL Support.=20 As you can see from the latest release I have done all this but it=20 doesn't work as expected. I don't like this because its too unclear=20 for me what happens and I also don't see why I need 4 Programs to=20 compile one little library.. Hey, this is not OpenOffice :-) Another thing: have you ever tried to update an application you just=20 downloaded off the internet with aclocal? I always get errors that=20 they were using another version of automake.. Aptitude tells me=20 that currently there are about 5 different version all incompatible=20 to each other.... this is great. I am not sure but I think one of the most complicated programs to=20 compile is MPlayer.. now go and look what configure script they=20 use :-) > > Or should I drop it and revert back to the former Makefiles and > > enhance them and provide a simple script on my own? > > I in my program have still my self-written configure.sh and the > Makefile. But I soon intend to go over to auto* why? Do you have reports that you script doesn't work everywhere? > > and btw.. kde3.2 and kdevelop3 rule :-) > > Naa,maybe I'll try kdevelop again... :-) Thanks for your opinion. I am still unsure wheter I should change to=20 my own scripts or to look at auto* again... Bye Clemens |
|
From: Robos <ro...@mu...> - 2004-03-28 19:27:56
|
On Sun, 28.03.04, reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, Hi Clemens > It's been a long time since I made my last change. I now have some > time finally :-) Actually I wanted to fix the callback problem to > make it work hand in hand with c++ apps. > > unfortunately I am now stuck with this sucky automake. It doesn't > work, it sucks.. I don't like it and.. ah yes the time i spent to > make automake/autoconf work was a complete waste because in that > time I could have written a nice configure script myself and also > an even nicer Makefile. > > What do you think? Does anyone provide me with makefiles.am and > configure.in for sdlconsole because I won't spend more time on it. If you can get yourself to look again at it try this page here: http://tools.devchannel.org/devtoolschannel/03/11/14/1615230.shtml?tid=46 It is really short and gets you going fast and quite good. > Or should I drop it and revert back to the former Makefiles and > enhance them and provide a simple script on my own? I in my program have still my self-written configure.sh and the Makefile. But I soon intend to go over to auto* > and btw.. kde3.2 and kdevelop3 rule :-) Naa,maybe I'll try kdevelop again... Cheers Robos > Regards > Clemens > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Sdlconsole-developers mailing list > Sdl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdlconsole-developers > -- Robos - gpg --recv-keys --keyserver blackhole.pca.dfn.de 6EEADA09 It's GNU/Linux dammit! F U M $ ! |
|
From: reflex-2000 <ref...@gm...> - 2004-03-28 13:42:57
|
Hello, It's been a long time since I made my last change. I now have some time finally :-) Actually I wanted to fix the callback problem to make it work hand in hand with c++ apps. unfortunately I am now stuck with this sucky automake. It doesn't work, it sucks.. I don't like it and.. ah yes the time i spent to make automake/autoconf work was a complete waste because in that time I could have written a nice configure script myself and also an even nicer Makefile. What do you think? Does anyone provide me with makefiles.am and configure.in for sdlconsole because I won't spend more time on it. Or should I drop it and revert back to the former Makefiles and enhance them and provide a simple script on my own? and btw.. kde3.2 and kdevelop3 rule :-) Regards Clemens |
|
From: reflex <ref...@gm...> - 2003-12-04 19:36:01
|
Ville Ranki schrieb: > (Resending as list works again :) > > Hello > is the command polling option coming soon? The code > exists, but i'd like to see it in official release. Sorry, I have no time at the moment.. and I don't like your patch :-) Regards -- Clemens Wacha wa...@gm... ICQ:12620492 proudly running Debian/GNU Linux. See http://www.debian.org |
|
From: Ville R. <vil...@tu...> - 2003-12-04 19:22:27
|
(Resending as list works again :) Hello is the command polling option coming soon? The code exists, but i'd like to see it in official release. -- -- Ville Ranki vil...@tu... 040-757 2533 http://www.vip.fi/~cosmo/ |
|
From: reflex <ref...@gm...> - 2003-12-04 18:24:10
|
Ville Ranki schrieb: > On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 18:32, Clemens Wacha wrote: > > adsf > > Seems to work but delivery took over 3 months. Strange... I so long ago I even cant remember what it was for... :-) -- Clemens Wacha wa...@gm... ICQ:12620492 proudly running Debian/GNU Linux. See http://www.debian.org |
|
From: Ville R. <vil...@tu...> - 2003-12-04 14:20:28
|
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 18:32, Clemens Wacha wrote: > adsf Seems to work but delivery took over 3 months. -- -- Ville Ranki vil...@tu... 040-757 2533 http://www.vip.fi/~cosmo/ |
|
From: Clemens W. <wa...@gm...> - 2003-12-04 09:16:36
|
adsf |
|
From: Ville R. <vil...@tu...> - 2003-10-15 18:20:38
|
Hello is the command polling option coming soon? The code exists, but i'd like to see it in official release. -- -- Ville Ranki vil...@tu... 040-757 2533 http://www.vip.fi/~cosmo/ |
|
From: reflex <ref...@gm...> - 2003-09-18 18:05:55
|
adsf -- Clemens Wacha wa...@gm... ICQ:12620492 proudly running Debian/GNU Linux. See http://www.debian.org |
|
From: reflex <ref...@gm...> - 2003-09-18 17:55:29
|
sdf -- Clemens Wacha wa...@gm... ICQ:12620492 proudly running Debian/GNU Linux. See http://www.debian.org |
|
From: reflex <ref...@gm...> - 2003-09-18 15:33:35
|
asdf -- Clemens Wacha wa...@gm... ICQ:12620492 proudly running Debian/GNU Linux. See http://www.debian.org |
