Re: [Sdl4fp-users] Compatibility issue with 1.2.0.1
Brought to you by:
trixx
From: Daniel F M. <dmo...@ar...> - 2006-01-10 15:53:44
|
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 12:32 +0000, Christian Speckner wrote: > Well, a possible fix would be to overload the corresponding functions, so > compatibility could be retained... I think that overloading on result types will not work. The compatibility problem is easy to workaround; I changed the longs to longbools because I considered that they make for cleaner codes (They would probably had been long bools in C if C had them ;-) ). However, I know that changes of interfaces in libraries sometimes hurt a lot, so if most of you prefer ints, I'll revert the change. Just say what you think here so I can know. Regards, Daniel -- "Why program by hand in five days what you can spend five years of your life automating." -- Terrence Parr, ANTLR author |