#28 sfr16

closed-works-for-me
5
2005-12-02
2005-11-17
Anonymous
No

Hi,

Is the document on the sfr section correct?
Section : 3.4.1.7 sfr / sfr16 / sfr32 / sbit
says "sfr16 at 0x8C8A TMR0;" is possible.

yet when I compile a similar header define using sfr16,
i would get syntax errors:

*** sdcc output for "sfr16 at 0x8C8A DPTR;"
lib_mcu/regsnd1.h:31: syntax error: token -> 'at' ;
column 8

Thanks.
Aaron.

Discussion

  • Maarten Brock

    Maarten Brock - 2005-11-17
    • status: open --> pending
     
  • Maarten Brock

    Maarten Brock - 2005-11-17
    • assigned_to: nobody --> maartenbrock
    • status: pending --> pending-works-for-me
     
  • Maarten Brock

    Maarten Brock - 2005-11-17

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=888171

    And you are using SDCC version ???
    And what does it say on the front page of the manual?

    Yes, it is correct for SDCC 2.5.4.

     
  • SourceForge Robot

    • status: pending-works-for-me --> closed-works-for-me
     
  • SourceForge Robot

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1312539

    This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
    previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
    did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
    the administrator of this Tracker).

     

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

JavaScript is required for this form.





No, thanks