Menu

#129 Summary of all uncommitted changes I applied on "my" SDCC

None
closed-accepted
None
1
2015-11-09
2009-03-22
Hubert Sack
No

I did some changes to SDCC, because I think they may be useful. If I remember correctely (about 1-2 years ago?), some of them were already discused as RFE.

Furthermore I added today a cosmetic change to src/SDCCmem.c in "printAllocInfoSeg" and "printAllocInfo" to omitt the unneccessary second trailing line in the listing.

All of the changes are in the attached "changes.dif" file

Discussion

  • Hubert Sack

    Hubert Sack - 2009-03-22

    "diff" of all changes I made in the sources

     
  • Hubert Sack

    Hubert Sack - 2009-03-22
    • priority: 5 --> 1
     
  • Borut Ražem

    Borut Ražem - 2011-07-21

    Applied 2nd (src/SDCCopt.c) and 3rd part (src/SDCCmem.c) of patch in svn revision: #6666.

    Maarten, can you please review and apply the 1st part (src/mcs51/gen.c) of the patch?

    Borut

     
  • Maarten Brock

    Maarten Brock - 2011-07-31

    I've added a modified approach based on this patch for removing MOV PSW in SDCC 3.0.4 #6700.

    Still have to look at the other parts in gen.c

     
  • Borut Ražem

    Borut Ražem - 2013-05-25

    Reverted (disabled) 2nd (src/SDCCopt.c) part of the patch in svn revision #8676. See #2165 Broken comparison.

    Borut

     
  • Maarten Brock

    Maarten Brock - 2015-11-08

    Applied modified second part of src/mcs51/gen.c in [r9296].
    Still have to look at the third part in gen.c.

     
  • Maarten Brock

    Maarten Brock - 2015-11-09
    • status: open --> closed-accepted
    • assigned_to: Maarten Brock
    • Group: -->
     
  • Maarten Brock

    Maarten Brock - 2015-11-09

    The last part is already covered by genLiteralAssign(). So this no longer applies.

     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.