I agree that its not complete. I also see that it generates wrong code. e.g
for code like below
void func (unsigned char );
unsigned char i,j;
j = !i;
sdcc -mavr -S generates
; test2.c 5
cpse r24,r24 ==> this is wrong i suppose
; test2.c 7
From: Jon McClintock [mailto:jammer@...]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:35 PM
To: Royce & Sharal Pereira
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] SDCC for AVR
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:42:31PM +0530, Royce & Sharal Pereira wrote:
> Can I safely use SDCC 2.3.1 for Atmel AVRs (AT90S2313)?
> The processor selection documentation says "in development, not complete."
I would strongly suggest you use avr-gcc; it's a much nicer toolchain.
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
Sdcc-user mailing list