From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2008-03-23 16:59:46
|
SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.8.0-rc2 and http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2010-10-22 18:38:56
|
Dear sdcc developers, the sdcc RC2 is released. Thanks to anybody helped to bring it to the life. Please consider the svn main branch as DEEPLY FROZEN, which means NOTHING can be committed without the agreement between sdcc developers and release manager. The SDCC 3.0.0 release schedule is published at http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.0.0%20Release. Borut |
From: Grissiom <cha...@gm...> - 2010-10-23 01:46:30
|
Hi devs, Congratulations! However, I failed to configure RC2 in not finding gputils, which has never happened before. With "--disable-pic-port" and "--disable-pic16-port", configure continues. Is it possible to auto-disable them when gputils is absent? Although it's not a "have-to" fix, but it's a little bit annoying... Besides, it seems that SDCC tries to install some pic stuff (usr/share/sdcc/non-free/lib/src/pic/*, usr/share/sdcc/lib/src/pic/*) even with pic port disabled. I don't do pic programming so I have no idea whether the headers and sources are useful to other chips. All the 2 problem are trivial things though... On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Borut Razem <bor...@si...> wrote: > Dear sdcc developers, > > the sdcc RC2 is released. Thanks to anybody helped to bring it to the life. > > Please consider the svn main branch as DEEPLY FROZEN, which means > NOTHING can be committed without the agreement between sdcc developers > and release manager. > > The SDCC 3.0.0 release schedule is published at > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.0.0%20Release. > > > Borut > -- Cheers, Grissiom |
From: Bill N. <nik...@us...> - 2010-10-29 09:58:59
|
Hi Borut, On 22 October 2010 21:38, Borut Razem <bor...@si...> wrote: > Dear sdcc developers, > > the sdcc RC2 is released. Thanks to anybody helped to bring it to the life. > > Please consider the svn main branch as DEEPLY FROZEN, which means > NOTHING can be committed without the agreement between sdcc developers > and release manager. > svn revision: 6037 I configure sdcc with the following: ./configure --disable-gbz80-port --disable-z80-port --disable-ds390-port --disable-ds400-port --disable-pic-port --disable-pic16-port --disable-hc08-port But on make install it still creates in /usr/local/bin sz80, shc08, savr, sdldz80, sdldgb, sdld6808 The same rule applies to /usr/local/share/sdcc/include/asm and /usr/local/share/sdcc/lib/src/{pic,pic16,z80,gdz80,hc08,z80} Thanks, Bill |
From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2010-10-29 18:43:48
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"><head> <title></title> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css"/> </head> <body> <div align="left"> <font face="Courier New" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> Hello Bill,</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Courier New" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> <br /> </span> </font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Courier New" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> I think we will not postpone the release for this issue.</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Courier New" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt">  Nevertheless it would be nice if it got fixed one day. To make sure we will not forget it, can you please turn this into a bug report in our tracker at sourceforge?</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Courier New" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> <br /> </span> </font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Courier New" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> Thank you,</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Courier New" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> Maarten Brock</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> <br /> </span> </font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > Hi Borut,</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > </span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > On 22 October 2010 21:38, Borut Razem <bor...@si...> wrote:</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > > Dear sdcc developers,</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > ></span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > > the sdcc RC2 is released. Thanks to anybody helped to bring it to the life.</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > ></span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > > Please consider the svn main branch as DEEPLY FROZEN, which means</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > > NOTHING can be committed without the agreement between sdcc developers</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > > and release manager.</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > ></span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > svn revision: 6037</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > </span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > I configure sdcc with the following:</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > ./configure --disable-gbz80-port --disable-z80-port</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > --disable-ds390-port --disable-ds400-port --disable-pic-port</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > --disable-pic16-port --disable-hc08-port</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > </span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > But on make install it still creates in /usr/local/bin</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > sz80, shc08, savr, sdldz80, sdldgb, sdld6808</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > </span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > The same rule applies to /usr/local/share/sdcc/include/asm</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > and /usr/local/share/sdcc/lib/src/{pic,pic16,z80,gdz80,hc08,z80}</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > </span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > Thanks,</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > </span></font> </div> <div align="left"> <font face="Arial" color="#7f0000" size="2"> <span style=" font-size:10pt"> > Bill</span></font> </div> <div align="left"> </div> </body> </html> |
From: Patryk <pa...@wp...> - 2012-06-29 23:10:20
|
Tested RC3 on Win98, it installs and works fine with 8051 project. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Borut Razem" <bor...@gm...> To: "Sdcc-User" <sdc...@li...>; "Sdcc-Devel" <sdc...@li...> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 6:56 PM Subject: [sdcc-devel] SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 3 > SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in > corresponding folders at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. I'm specially interested on Mac OS X ppc > architecture since I can not test it. Please let me know if the > pre-built binaries run on this platform. > > Bout > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2009-03-15 09:51:42
|
SDCC 2.9.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2009-03-15 09:55:15
|
Dear sdcc developers, the sdcc RC2 is released. Thanks to anybody helped to bring it to the life. Please consider the svn main branch as DEEPLY FROZEN, which means NOTHING can be committed without the agreement between sdcc developers and release manager. The SDCC 2.9.0 release schedule is published at http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/release_wiki/index.php?page=SDCC+2.9.0+Release. Borut Borut Razem wrote: > SDCC 2.9.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. > > Borut > > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2010-10-22 18:36:09
|
SDCC 3.0.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/snapshot_builds/sdcc-3.0.0-rc2 If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-11-18 21:37:16
|
SDCC 3.1.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/snapshot_builds/sdcc-3.1.0-rc2 If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-11-22 21:19:45
|
SDCC 3.1.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/snapshot_builds/sdcc-3.1.0-rc3 If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2012-06-17 15:07:33
|
SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/snapshot_builds/sdcc-3.2.0-rc1 If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2012-06-24 18:54:13
|
SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in corresponding folders at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. Borut |
From: Diego H. <die...@di...> - 2012-06-25 20:28:13
|
Tested for PIC16 (18f4550) on linux x86. It seems to work fine and code reduction of about 0.3% versus a snapshot 1 month old. Regards, Diego Herranz On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Borut Ražem <bor...@gm...> wrote: > SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in > corresponding folders at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. > > Borut > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2012-06-29 16:56:58
|
SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in corresponding folders at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. I'm specially interested on Mac OS X ppc architecture since I can not test it. Please let me know if the pre-built binaries run on this platform. Bout |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2012-06-30 20:57:03
|
Claude Sylvain found an error in sdcc installer: installer suggests "C:\Program Files\SDCC" instead of "C:\Program Files (x86)\SDCC". I repacked the sdcc 3.2.0 RC3 Windows setup package and renamed it to sdcc-3.2.0-rc3a-setup.exe. You can find the package at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/sdcc-win32/3.2.0/sdcc-3.2.0-rc3a-setup.exe/download. P.S.: the Windows setup package content is exactly the same as for RC3. This change does not affect packages for other platforms. Borut On 29. 06. 2012 18:56, Borut Ražem wrote: > SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in > corresponding folders at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. I'm specially interested on Mac OS X ppc > architecture since I can not test it. Please let me know if the > pre-built binaries run on this platform. > > Bout |
From: M L <mar...@gm...> - 2012-07-01 11:19:33
|
Does updated manual says now anything about NOT SUPPORTED option --stack-auto on pic16 port? I wasted many days for searching why libs compiled with --stack-auto won't work correctly. There is only one or two posts on list with such warning, manual in pic16 chapter says nothing about this problem. regards, -- Marico 2012/6/29, Borut Ražem <bor...@gm...>: > SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in > corresponding folders at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. I'm specially interested on Mac OS X ppc > architecture since I can not test it. Please let me know if the > pre-built binaries run on this platform. > > Bout > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2012-07-06 21:28:19
|
SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in corresponding folders at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages. I'm specially interested on Mac OS X ppc architecture since I can not test it. Please let me know if the pre-built binaries run on this platform. Bot |
From: Diego H. <die...@di...> - 2012-06-29 18:02:26
|
PIC16 (18F4550) tested on linux x86. Exactly the same code generated than RC2. Regards, Diego On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Borut Ražem <bor...@gm...> wrote: > SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in > corresponding folders at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. I'm specially interested on Mac OS X ppc > architecture since I can not test it. Please let me know if the > pre-built binaries run on this platform. > > Bout > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2012-06-30 06:37:09
|
Diego, thanks for the report. Borut On 29. 06. 2012 20:01, Diego Herranz wrote: > PIC16 (18F4550) tested on linux x86. Exactly the same code generated > than RC2. > > Regards, > Diego > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Borut Ražem <bor...@gm... > <mailto:bor...@gm...>> wrote: > > SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in > corresponding folders at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > <mailto:sdc...@li...>. > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. I'm specially interested on Mac OS X ppc > architecture since I can not test it. Please let me know if the > pre-built binaries run on this platform. > > Bout > |
From: Claude S. <csy...@el...> - 2012-06-30 15:16:25
|
On 2012-06-24 14:54, Borut RaÂem wrote: > > SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in > corresponding folders at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages. > - Installed SDCC 3.2.0 RC3 (not RC2) on a Windows 7 Professional 64-bit computer, and the result is the following: - Installer suggest "C:\Program Files\SDCC" instead of "C:\Program Files (x86)\SDCC". Have to modify manually to "C:\Program Files (x86)\SDCC" to have SDCC installed in 32-bit programs directory. - Done functional tests, using SDCC to build for a Z80 based target, and the result is the following: - When building the project for debugging, with the following tools options, all is correct. +++ CPPFLAGS = --debug -D_DEBUG OPTFLAGS = --nooverlay --nogcse --noinvariant --noinduction --nojtbound --noloopreverse --no-peep --no-reg-params +++ - When building the project for release, with the following tools options, "failed" messages are displayed. +++ CPPFLAGS = OPTFLAGS = --opt-code-size +++ These "failed" messages look like the following: +++ z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node rst 0x10 z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node rst 0x18 z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node ... z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di +++ - Will do another tests to try to track down these "failed" messages. From a SDCC user, Claude |
From: Claude S. <csy...@el...> - 2012-06-30 15:49:57
|
On 2012-06-30 10:49, Claude Sylvain wrote: > > - Done functional tests, using SDCC to build for a Z80 > based target, and the result is the following: > > - When building the project for debugging, with the > following tools options, all is correct. > +++ > CPPFLAGS = --debug -D_DEBUG > OPTFLAGS = --nooverlay --nogcse --noinvariant --noinduction --nojtbound > --noloopreverse --no-peep --no-reg-params > +++ > ... > ... > > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node rst 0x18 > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node > ... > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di > +++ > > - Will do another tests to try to track down these > "failed" messages. > - Forget results about the functional tests in the previous E-mail. I made a mistake when setting up the tools. Sorry, Claude |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2012-06-30 16:08:05
|
On 30.06.2012 16:49, Claude Sylvain wrote: > +++ > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node rst 0x10 > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node rst 0x18 > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node > ... > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di > z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di > +++ The --no-peep must be what makes the difference here. Can you give a small example file that reproduces the problem? I susprect that the problem can only occour when there is a combination of inline assembly and C control structures in one function. Philipp |
From: Claude S. <csy...@el...> - 2012-06-30 16:55:39
|
On 2012-06-30 12:07, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > > On 30.06.2012 16:49, Claude Sylvain wrote: > >> +++ >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node rst 0x10 >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node rst 0x18 >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node >> ... >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di >> z80instructionSize() failed to parse line node di >> +++ > > The --no-peep must be what makes the difference here. Can you give a > small example file that reproduces the problem? I susprect that the > problem can only occour when there is a combination of inline assembly > and C control structures in one function. > Hello Philipp, - I made a mistake when setting up my built environment. The above mentioned errors do not exist with SDCC 3.2.0rc3. Sorry for this, Claude |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2012-06-30 18:37:27
|
On 30. 06. 2012 16:49, Claude Sylvain wrote: > On 2012-06-24 14:54, Borut RaÂem wrote: > >> SDCC 3.2.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 >> Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available in >> corresponding folders at: >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files >> >> If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list >> sdc...@li.... >> >> I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running >> pre-compiled binary packages. >> > - Installed SDCC 3.2.0 RC3 (not RC2) on a Windows 7 Professional > 64-bit computer, and the result is the following: > > - Installer suggest "C:\Program Files\SDCC" instead > of "C:\Program Files (x86)\SDCC". > Have to modify manually to "C:\Program Files (x86)\SDCC" to > have SDCC installed in 32-bit programs directory. Claude, I uploaded a corrected version at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/sdcc-win32/3.2.0/sdcc-3.2.0-rc3a-setup.exe. Can you please try it and let me know if it works for you? Thanks for the report! Borut |