From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2007-05-10 19:54:55
|
SDCC 2.7.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and ppc Mac OS X are available at: http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.7.0-rc1 and http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... Borut |
From: Bob C. <bco...@ve...> - 2010-10-14 02:30:39
|
You need to build from the sdcc directory, not the sdcc/src directory. ./configure make note: make can take well over an hour, even more than 2 hours, on slower dual core laptops If you have all the needed dependencies installed, it should build just fine. Then... sudo make install Bob Cochran Maryland, USA On 10/13/2010 09:09 PM, Claude Sylvain wrote: > > > - Also, I built directly from the directory where is the source code. > Maybe, building from an outside directory will get rid of that errors. > I will try that. > > > Claude. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > |
From: Claude S. <csy...@el...> - 2010-10-14 12:53:59
|
> > On 10/13/2010 09:09 PM, Claude Sylvain wrote: > >> >> - Also, I built directly from the directory where is the source code. >> Maybe, building from an outside directory will get rid of that errors. >> I will try that. >> On 13/10/2010 22:30, Bob Cochran wrote: > > You need to build from the sdcc directory, not the sdcc/src directory. > - I was not enough clear in my previous mail. When I wrote "built directly from the directory where is the source code", I mean built directly from "/sdcc" directory. > > ./configure > make > - This is what I have done. Except for the extra parameter "--prefix=/usr/local/sdcc" in "configure". > > If you have all the needed dependencies installed, it should build just > fine. Then... > - I installed everything on Cygwin (1.7.x). So I assume, that there is a chance that all needed libraries are there. > > sudo make install > - Oh yes. On GNU/Linux, this have to be done with "sudo". But, I built under Cygwin 1.7.x / Windows XP Professional as an administrator. So, no need for the "sudo". Thank you for your advice. Claude. |
From: Claude S. <csy...@el...> - 2010-10-14 15:42:24
|
Hello Borut, - I rebuilt the sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc1 on an another computer, using Cygwin 1.7.x under Windows XP Professional. - I rebuilt it using two different way: 1) Rebuilt from "/sdcc" directory. 2) Rebuilt from an external directory ("/sdcc_build") - The results seems to be the same for both rebuilt, and is as follow: "configure --prefix=/usr/local/sdcc": Successfull. "make": Errors. However, there is no more "Permission denied" errors, as on the other computer. - Displayed errors when doing "make" are as follow: +++ make[5]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r c1/device/lib/pic' gputils not found -- PIC14 library not built! make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/lib/pic' cp: cannot stat `pic/bin/*.*': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic14] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic14 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r c1/device/lib' +++ +++ source='delay/delay100ktcy.S' object='delay100ktcy.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/sh ../depcomp \ ':' -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../../../include/pic16 -I../../../non- free/include/pic16 -I. -p18f452 -c -o delay100ktcy.o `test -f 'delay/delay100ktc y.S' || echo './'`delay/delay100ktcy.S ../depcomp: line 611: exec: :: not found make[7]: *** [delay100ktcy.o] Error 127 make[7]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/lib/pic16/libc' make[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/lib/pic16' make[5]: *** [all] Error 2 make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/lib/pic16' cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/lib*.a': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/crt0*.o': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic16] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic16 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r c1/device/lib' +++ +++ make[5]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r c1/device/non-free/lib/pic' gputils not found -- PIC14 library not built! make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/non-free/lib/pic' cp: cannot stat `pic/bin/*.*': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic14] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/non-free/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic14 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r c1/device/non-free/lib' +++ +++ make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/non-free/lib/pic16' cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/lib*.a': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic16] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc 1/device/non-free/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic16 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r c1/device/non-free/lib' +++ - Remarks: - "make" errors seems to be only on PIC port. So, I assume that the built binary is acceptable for other ports (Z80, 80x51, etc). - What is "gputils". Claude |
From: Raphael N. <rn...@we...> - 2010-10-14 16:05:30
|
Hi, > +++ > make[5]: Entering directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r > c1/device/lib/pic' > gputils not found -- PIC14 library not built! > make[5]: Leaving directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc > 1/device/lib/pic' > cp: cannot stat `pic/bin/*.*': No such file or directory > make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic14] Error 1 (ignored) > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc > 1/device/lib' > make clean_intermediate-pic14 > make[4]: Entering directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r > c1/device/lib' > +++ gputils are assembler/linker-tools used by the PIC/PIC16 backends; output is desired, make install should probably fail silently ... > +++ > source='delay/delay100ktcy.S' object='delay100ktcy.o' libtool=no \ > DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/sh ../depcomp \ > ':' -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../../../include/pic16 > -I../../../non- > free/include/pic16 -I. -p18f452 -c -o delay100ktcy.o `test -f > 'delay/delay100ktc > y.S' || echo './'`delay/delay100ktcy.S > ../depcomp: line 611: exec: :: not found > make[7]: *** [delay100ktcy.o] Error 127 > make[7]: Leaving directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc > 1/device/lib/pic16/libc' > make[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[6]: Leaving directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc > 1/device/lib/pic16' > make[5]: *** [all] Error 2 Same here: as gputils are not found, the build system assumes : (a command, that accepts and discards parameters and exits successfully). Unfortunately, : is as shell built-in, which cannot be exec'ed. We should probably use 'true' instead of ':' -- or even better, avoid trying to build anything if gputils are not found. I shall have to look into this. > make[5]: Leaving directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc > 1/device/lib/pic16' > cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/lib*.a': No such file or directory > cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/crt0*.o': No such file or directory > make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic16] Error 1 (ignored) > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc > 1/device/lib' > make clean_intermediate-pic16 > make[4]: Entering directory > `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r > c1/device/lib' > +++ Same problem as with pic14 install: nothing was build, so nothing can be installed. This should also fail silently or be turned into a do-nothing rule unless gputils are found. Thank you for the reports. Raphael |
From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2010-10-14 16:10:56
|
Hello, Shouldn't ./configure check for gputils? And I would not silently ignore this error unless both pic's were disabled in the configuration, which Claude did not do. Maarten > Hi, > >> +++ >> make[5]: Entering directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r >> c1/device/lib/pic' >> gputils not found -- PIC14 library not built! >> make[5]: Leaving directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc >> 1/device/lib/pic' >> cp: cannot stat `pic/bin/*.*': No such file or directory >> make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic14] Error 1 (ignored) >> make[4]: Leaving directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc >> 1/device/lib' >> make clean_intermediate-pic14 >> make[4]: Entering directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r >> c1/device/lib' >> +++ > > gputils are assembler/linker-tools used by the PIC/PIC16 backends; output > is desired, make install should probably fail silently ... > >> +++ >> source='delay/delay100ktcy.S' object='delay100ktcy.o' libtool=no \ >> DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/sh ../depcomp \ >> ':' -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../../../include/pic16 >> -I../../../non- >> free/include/pic16 -I. -p18f452 -c -o delay100ktcy.o `test -f >> 'delay/delay100ktc >> y.S' || echo './'`delay/delay100ktcy.S >> ../depcomp: line 611: exec: :: not found >> make[7]: *** [delay100ktcy.o] Error 127 >> make[7]: Leaving directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc >> 1/device/lib/pic16/libc' >> make[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make[6]: Leaving directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc >> 1/device/lib/pic16' >> make[5]: *** [all] Error 2 > > Same here: as gputils are not found, the build system assumes : (a > command, that accepts and discards parameters and exits successfully). > Unfortunately, : is as shell built-in, which cannot be exec'ed. We should > probably use 'true' instead of ':' -- or even better, avoid trying to > build anything if gputils are not found. I shall have to look into this. > >> make[5]: Leaving directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc >> 1/device/lib/pic16' >> cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/lib*.a': No such file or directory >> cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/crt0*.o': No such file or directory >> make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic16] Error 1 (ignored) >> make[4]: Leaving directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc >> 1/device/lib' >> make clean_intermediate-pic16 >> make[4]: Entering directory >> `/home/claude/work/software/pc/sdcc/sdcc-src-3.0.0-r >> c1/device/lib' >> +++ > > Same problem as with pic14 install: nothing was build, so nothing can be > installed. This should also fail silently or be turned into a do-nothing > rule unless gputils are found. > > > Thank you for the reports. > > > Raphael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > > |
From: Raphael N. <rn...@we...> - 2010-10-14 18:23:27
Attachments:
patches.tbz2
|
Hi, > Shouldn't ./configure check for gputils? Configure did check for gputils, but did not error out if they were not available due to a bug of mine (in pic16/configure.ac; the pic-port would never have errored out but continued to fail on build). I attach a patch (0003-build-system.patch and 0004-generated.patch) to make both pic- and pic16 configure-scripts abort with error if gputils are not found, issuing an error like gputils (gpasm, gplink, and gplib) are required but not found. Either install gputils or reconfigure with --disable-pic-port and --disable-pic16-port. in both ports (devices/{non-free,.}/lib/{pic,pic16}/configure). Tested (a) without gpasm (causing abort), (b) without gpasm, with --disable-pic-port (aborts when configuring pic16), (c) with gpasm and --disable-pic-port --disable-pic16-port (succeeds without pic ports), (d) with gpasm and pic/pic16 ports included (succeeds as well). After applying the patches but before commiting one might want to rerun "autoreconf-2.65 -fi", as the patches are generated with autoconf 2.67, which is reflected in aclocal.m4 . Unrelated, build CRITICAL: Another patch (0001-target.patch) fixes the include path generation logic in SDCCmain.c by avoiding use of the uninitialized 'target' -- causes SIGSEGV. A last patch (0002-device-doc.patch) fixes a minor error in the list of supported pic14 devices. Awaiting your approval (or commit). Raphael |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2010-10-14 19:13:06
|
Raphael, please commit the patches. Sorry for the mistake I made while trying to optimize your previous patch :-[ I was already wandering why some snapshot regression tests and packages are not done... Borut On 10/14/2010 08:23 PM, Raphael Neider wrote: > Hi, > >> Shouldn't ./configure check for gputils? > > Configure did check for gputils, but did not error out if they were > not available due to a bug of mine (in pic16/configure.ac; the > pic-port would never have errored out but continued to fail on build). > > I attach a patch (0003-build-system.patch and 0004-generated.patch) to > make both pic- and pic16 configure-scripts abort with error if gputils > are not found, issuing an error like > > gputils (gpasm, gplink, and gplib) are required but not found. > Either install gputils or reconfigure with --disable-pic-port and > --disable-pic16-port. > > in both ports (devices/{non-free,.}/lib/{pic,pic16}/configure). > > Tested (a) without gpasm (causing abort), (b) without gpasm, with > --disable-pic-port (aborts when configuring pic16), (c) with gpasm and > --disable-pic-port --disable-pic16-port (succeeds without pic ports), > (d) with gpasm and pic/pic16 ports included (succeeds as well). > > After applying the patches but before commiting one might want to > rerun "autoreconf-2.65 -fi", as the patches are generated with > autoconf 2.67, which is reflected in aclocal.m4 . > > > Unrelated, build CRITICAL: > Another patch (0001-target.patch) fixes the include path generation > logic in SDCCmain.c by avoiding use of the uninitialized 'target' -- > causes SIGSEGV. > > A last patch (0002-device-doc.patch) fixes a minor error in the list > of supported pic14 devices. > > > Awaiting your approval (or commit). > > Raphael |
From: Bob C. <bco...@ve...> - 2010-10-14 22:41:54
|
How do I apply the patches? Do I use, for example this from inside the sdcc directory: patch -p0 0001-target.patch Thanks Bob Cochran On 10/14/2010 02:23 PM, Raphael Neider wrote: > Hi, > >> Shouldn't ./configure check for gputils? > > Configure did check for gputils, but did not error out if they were > not available due to a bug of mine (in pic16/configure.ac; the > pic-port would never have errored out but continued to fail on build). > > I attach a patch (0003-build-system.patch and 0004-generated.patch) to > make both pic- and pic16 configure-scripts abort with error if gputils > are not found, issuing an error like > > gputils (gpasm, gplink, and gplib) are required but not found. > Either install gputils or reconfigure with --disable-pic-port and > --disable-pic16-port. > > in both ports (devices/{non-free,.}/lib/{pic,pic16}/configure). > > Tested (a) without gpasm (causing abort), (b) without gpasm, with > --disable-pic-port (aborts when configuring pic16), (c) with gpasm and > --disable-pic-port --disable-pic16-port (succeeds without pic ports), > (d) with gpasm and pic/pic16 ports included (succeeds as well). > > After applying the patches but before commiting one might want to > rerun "autoreconf-2.65 -fi", as the patches are generated with > autoconf 2.67, which is reflected in aclocal.m4 . > > > Unrelated, build CRITICAL: > Another patch (0001-target.patch) fixes the include path generation > logic in SDCCmain.c by avoiding use of the uninitialized 'target' -- > causes SIGSEGV. > > A last patch (0002-device-doc.patch) fixes a minor error in the list > of supported pic14 devices. > > > Awaiting your approval (or commit). > > Raphael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > > > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2010-10-15 05:06:42
|
On 10/15/2010 12:41 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: > How do I apply the patches? Do I use, for example this from inside the > sdcc directory: > > patch -p0 0001-target.patch > > patch -p0 < 0001-target.patch But patches are already applied to the svn, so please wait for the today's snapshot build and try to rebuild sdcc from the snapshot build source package, since that one, or it's successor, will be released as sdcc 3.0.0 RC2. Borut > Thanks > > Bob Cochran > > > On 10/14/2010 02:23 PM, Raphael Neider wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >>> Shouldn't ./configure check for gputils? >>> >> Configure did check for gputils, but did not error out if they were >> not available due to a bug of mine (in pic16/configure.ac; the >> pic-port would never have errored out but continued to fail on build). >> >> I attach a patch (0003-build-system.patch and 0004-generated.patch) to >> make both pic- and pic16 configure-scripts abort with error if gputils >> are not found, issuing an error like >> >> gputils (gpasm, gplink, and gplib) are required but not found. >> Either install gputils or reconfigure with --disable-pic-port and >> --disable-pic16-port. >> >> in both ports (devices/{non-free,.}/lib/{pic,pic16}/configure). >> >> Tested (a) without gpasm (causing abort), (b) without gpasm, with >> --disable-pic-port (aborts when configuring pic16), (c) with gpasm and >> --disable-pic-port --disable-pic16-port (succeeds without pic ports), >> (d) with gpasm and pic/pic16 ports included (succeeds as well). >> >> After applying the patches but before commiting one might want to >> rerun "autoreconf-2.65 -fi", as the patches are generated with >> autoconf 2.67, which is reflected in aclocal.m4 . >> >> >> Unrelated, build CRITICAL: >> Another patch (0001-target.patch) fixes the include path generation >> logic in SDCCmain.c by avoiding use of the uninitialized 'target' -- >> causes SIGSEGV. >> >> A last patch (0002-device-doc.patch) fixes a minor error in the list >> of supported pic14 devices. >> >> >> Awaiting your approval (or commit). >> >> Raphael >> |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2007-05-22 18:20:52
|
SDCC 2.7.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and ppc Mac OS X are available at: http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.7.0-rc2 and http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2007-05-26 13:56:23
|
SDCC 2.7.0 Release Candidate 3 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and ppc Mac OS X are available at: http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.7.0-rc3 and http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php This is an additional unplanned release candidate where all currently known bugs, planned for sdcc 2.7.0 release, are fixed. The target date for sdcc 2.7.0 release is still 2007-05-31. If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... Borut |
From: Lin R. <wo...@ar...> - 2007-05-26 12:53:34
|
Borut, SDCC 2.7.0 RC2 Z80 port works well with our software. Hope to see 2.7.0 final soon. Woody AR1688/PA1688 based IP phone mailing list -- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pa1688/ VOIP/AR1688 BLOG -- http://aredfox.spaces.live.com/ MSN: wo...@ar... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Borut Razem" <bor...@si...> To: "Development chatter about sdcc" <sdc...@li...> Cc: "Sdcc-User" <sdc...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:20 AM Subject: [Sdcc-user] SDCC 2.7.0 Release Candidate 2 > SDCC 2.7.0 Release Candidate 2 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and ppc Mac OS X are available at: > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.7.0-rc2 > and > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > Borut > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2008-03-09 13:20:13
|
SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1 and http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages, specially on Mac OS X platforms: - ppc Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x - i386 Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x Borut |
From: Lin R. <wo...@di...> - 2008-03-09 18:32:35
|
Just tested the Z80 port of release candidate 1, no obvious bug found so far, but I noticed a 2%-5% increase in code size comparing with 2.7.0. Woody AR1688 and PA1688 based IP phone mailing list -- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pa1688/ VOIP and AR1688 BLOG -- http://aredfox.spaces.live.com/ MSN: wo...@ar... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Borut Razem" <bor...@si...> To: "Development chatter about sdcc" <sdc...@li...> Cc: "Sdcc-User" <sdc...@li...> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 9:19 PM Subject: [sdcc-devel] SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 > SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1 > and > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages, specially on Mac OS X platforms: > - ppc Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x > - i386 Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x > > Borut > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2008-03-09 18:35:29
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lin Rongrong schrieb: > Just tested the Z80 port of release candidate 1, no obvious bug found so > far, but I noticed a 2%-5% increase in code size comparing with 2.7.0. > Can you provide some code samples where the code size increase is most noticeable, along with the generated .asm files from both 2.7.0 and 2.8.0 RC1? What are the command line options you used? Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH1C3dbtUV+xsoLpoRAhZrAKCMtmvWCf29fMd5no+YgU2rf42CLgCgvm7g RoW7QscppXcZQEupYpYUerE= =NXlj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Lin R. <wo...@di...> - 2008-03-09 19:00:36
|
Just tested a small MCS51 program of mine, with 2.7.0 the binary size is 2797 bytes, with 2.8.0 RC1 the binary size is 2755 bytes My Z80 programs are rather large, totally near 190k bytes in binary, will check detail difference later. Woody AR1688 and PA1688 based IP phone mailing list -- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pa1688/ VOIP and AR1688 BLOG -- http://aredfox.spaces.live.com/ MSN: wo...@ar... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lin Rongrong" <wo...@di...> To: "Development chatter about sdcc" <sdc...@li...> Cc: <sdc...@li...> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:51 AM Subject: Re: [sdcc-devel] SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 > My command line option is most common "-mz80 -c --codeseg CODE". > I will check details asm difference tomorrow. > > Woody > > AR1688 and PA1688 based IP phone mailing list -- > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pa1688/ > VOIP and AR1688 BLOG -- http://aredfox.spaces.live.com/ > MSN: wo...@ar... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Philipp Klaus Krause" <pk...@sp...> > To: "Development chatter about sdcc" <sdc...@li...> > Cc: <sdc...@li...> > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:35 AM > Subject: Re: [sdcc-devel] SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Lin Rongrong schrieb: >>> Just tested the Z80 port of release candidate 1, no obvious bug found so >>> far, but I noticed a 2%-5% increase in code size comparing with 2.7.0. >>> >> >> Can you provide some code samples where the code size increase is most >> noticeable, along with the generated .asm files from both 2.7.0 and >> 2.8.0 RC1? What are the command line options you used? >> >> Philipp >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iD8DBQFH1C3dbtUV+xsoLpoRAhZrAKCMtmvWCf29fMd5no+YgU2rf42CLgCgvm7g >> RoW7QscppXcZQEupYpYUerE= >> =NXlj >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> sdcc-devel mailing list >> sdc...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel |
From: Lin R. <wo...@di...> - 2008-03-09 18:51:39
|
My command line option is most common "-mz80 -c --codeseg CODE". I will check details asm difference tomorrow. Woody AR1688 and PA1688 based IP phone mailing list -- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pa1688/ VOIP and AR1688 BLOG -- http://aredfox.spaces.live.com/ MSN: wo...@ar... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philipp Klaus Krause" <pk...@sp...> To: "Development chatter about sdcc" <sdc...@li...> Cc: <sdc...@li...> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:35 AM Subject: Re: [sdcc-devel] SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lin Rongrong schrieb: >> Just tested the Z80 port of release candidate 1, no obvious bug found so >> far, but I noticed a 2%-5% increase in code size comparing with 2.7.0. >> > > Can you provide some code samples where the code size increase is most > noticeable, along with the generated .asm files from both 2.7.0 and > 2.8.0 RC1? What are the command line options you used? > > Philipp > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFH1C3dbtUV+xsoLpoRAhZrAKCMtmvWCf29fMd5no+YgU2rf42CLgCgvm7g > RoW7QscppXcZQEupYpYUerE= > =NXlj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2009-03-01 21:39:53
|
SDCC 2.9.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.9.0-rc1 and http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages, specially on Mac OS X platforms: - ppc Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x - i386 Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x Borut |
From: Bob C. <bco...@ve...> - 2010-10-12 02:20:48
|
It looks like I was able to compile the source code for this successfully on a Fedora 13, x86_64 system which already has the Fedora sdcc package installed. I did this on an older Dell Latitude E6400 notebook with 4 Gb memory and the compile took a very long time to complete -- I didn't time it but I would say it went on well over an hour. I haven't tried to do a 'make install'. I may do this on the beta version of Fedora 14, but attempt to package it as an rpm and install it from the rpm. Hopefully we will see this version of sdcc as an official Fedora package. I made no changes at all to any of the sources. I just unpacked the sources, and ran ./configure make that was all I needed to do for a successful build. Bob Cochran Maryland, USA On 10/10/2010 11:10 AM, Borut Razem wrote: > SDCC 3.0.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/snapshot_builds/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1 > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages, specially on ppc and i386 Mac OS X platforms. > > Borut > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2010-10-12 05:12:14
|
Hi Bob, thanks for the report. Borut On 10/12/2010 04:20 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: > It looks like I was able to compile the source code for this > successfully on a Fedora 13, x86_64 system which already has the Fedora > sdcc package installed. I did this on an older Dell Latitude E6400 > notebook with 4 Gb memory and the compile took a very long time to > complete -- I didn't time it but I would say it went on well over an hour. > > I haven't tried to do a 'make install'. I may do this on the beta > version of Fedora 14, but attempt to package it as an rpm and install it > from the rpm. Hopefully we will see this version of sdcc as an official > Fedora package. > > I made no changes at all to any of the sources. I just unpacked the > sources, and ran > > ./configure > make > > that was all I needed to do for a successful build. > > Bob Cochran > Maryland, USA > > > On 10/10/2010 11:10 AM, Borut Razem wrote: > >> SDCC 3.0.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 >> Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/snapshot_builds/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1 >> >> If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list >> sdc...@li.... >> >> I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running >> pre-compiled binary packages, specially on ppc and i386 Mac OS X platforms. >> >> Borut >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports >> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. >> Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great >> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb >> _______________________________________________ >> Sdcc-user mailing list >> Sdc...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > > |
From: Candido l. <c.r...@rc...> - 2008-03-09 13:26:59
|
On Sunday 09 March 2008 09:19, Borut Razem wrote: You don't have permission to access /snapshots/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1-setup.exe on this server. > SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 > Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1 > and > http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php > > If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li.... > > I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running > pre-compiled binary packages, specially on Mac OS X platforms: - ppc Mac OS > X 10.4.x and 10.5.x > - i386 Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x > > Borut > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2008-03-09 13:40:09
|
Now it should be OK. Thank you, Borut Candido lopez wrote: > On Sunday 09 March 2008 09:19, Borut Razem wrote: > > You don't have permission to > access /snapshots/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1-setup.exe on this server. > > >> SDCC 2.8.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 >> Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: >> http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/sdcc-2.8.0-rc1 >> and >> http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/snap.php >> >> If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list >> sdc...@li.... >> >> I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running >> pre-compiled binary packages, specially on Mac OS X platforms: - ppc Mac OS >> X 10.4.x and 10.5.x >> - i386 Mac OS X 10.4.x and 10.5.x >> >> Borut >> >> |
From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2010-10-10 15:10:38
|
SDCC 3.0.0 Release Candidate 1 source, doc and binary packages for x86 Linux, 32 bit Windows and universal Mac OS X are available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/snapshot_builds/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1 If you find a mistake, please send a mail to sdcc-devel mailing list sdc...@li.... I would appreciate any reports about a success or failure of running pre-compiled binary packages, specially on ppc and i386 Mac OS X platforms. Borut |
From: Claude S. <csy...@el...> - 2010-10-11 18:38:53
|
Hello Borut, - Forget my previous email about "sdcc-20101011-6022". I was wrongly thinking that "sdcc-20101011-6022" was "sdcc-3.0.0-rc1". - I downloaded the right package ("sdcc-src-3.0.0-rc1.tar.bz2"), and seems that it built correctly on the following platform: - Cygwin 1.7.x on Windows XP Professionnal. - However, when installing ("make install"), the following (non-fatal) errors are displayed: Remark: I have administrator privilege when installing the package. +++ ... /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c ../..//bin/sdcdb.exe /usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdcdb.exe strip /usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdcdb.exe strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdcdb.exe'; reason: Permission deni ed make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de bugger/mcs51' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s im/ucsim' ... test -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin || /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c s51.exe /usr/local/sdcc/bin/s51.exe strip /usr/local/sdcc/bin/s51.exe strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/s51.exe'; reason: Permission denied make[2]: *** [install] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/si m/ucsim/s51.src' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s im/ucsim/avr.src' make -C ../cmd.src all ... test -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin || /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c savr.exe /usr/local/sdcc/bin/savr.exe strip /usr/local/sdcc/bin/savr.exe strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/savr.exe'; reason: Permission denie d make[2]: *** [install] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/si m/ucsim/avr.src' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s im/ucsim/z80.src' ... test -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin || /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c sz80.exe /usr/local/sdcc/bin/sz80.exe strip /usr/local/sdcc/bin/sz80.exe strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/sz80.exe'; reason: Permission denie d make[2]: *** [install] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/si m/ucsim/z80.src' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s im/ucsim/hc08.src' make -C ../cmd.src all make[3]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s im/ucsim/cmd.src' ... test -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin || /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c shc08.exe /usr/local/sdcc/bin/shc08.exe strip /usr/local/sdcc/bin/shc08.exe strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/shc08.exe'; reason: Permission deni ed make[2]: *** [install] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/si m/ucsim/hc08.src' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s im/ucsim/doc' test -d /usr/local/sdcc/share/doc//ucsim || /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sd cc/share/doc//ucsim ... make[5]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/d evice/lib/pic' gputils not found -- PIC14 library not built! make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/lib/pic' cp: cannot stat `pic/bin/*.*': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic14] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic14 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/d evice/lib' ... source='delay/delay100ktcy.S' object='delay100ktcy.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/sh ../depcomp \ ':' -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../../../include/pic16 -I../../../non- free/include/pic16 -I. -p18f452 -c -o delay100ktcy.o `test -f 'delay/delay100ktc y.S' || echo './'`delay/delay100ktcy.S ../depcomp: line 611: exec: :: not found make[7]: *** [delay100ktcy.o] Error 127 make[7]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/lib/pic16/libc' make[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/lib/pic16' make[5]: *** [all] Error 2 make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/lib/pic16' cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/lib*.a': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/crt0*.o': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic16] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic16 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/d evice/lib' ... make[5]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/d evice/non-free/lib/pic' gputils not found -- PIC14 library not built! make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/non-free/lib/pic' cp: cannot stat `pic/bin/*.*': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic14] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/non-free/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic14 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/d evice/non-free/lib' ... make[7]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/non-free/lib/pic16' make[6]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/non-free/lib/pic16' make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/non-free/lib/pic16' cp: cannot stat `pic16/*/lib*.a': No such file or directory make[4]: [port-specific-objects-pic16] Error 1 (ignored) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/de vice/non-free/lib' make clean_intermediate-pic16 make[4]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/d evice/non-free/lib' ... make[1]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s upport/packihx' /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c ../.././bin/packihx.exe `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/packihx.ex e|sed 's,x,x,'` strip `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/packihx.exe|sed 's,x,x,'` strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/packihx.exe'; reason: Permission de nied make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/su pport/packihx' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/d oc' /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/share/doc/sdcc ... mkdir -p /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c ../../bin/makebin.exe `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/makebin.exe| sed 's,x,x,'` strip `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/makebin.exe|sed 's,x,x,'` strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/makebin.exe'; reason: Permission de nied make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/su pport/makebin' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s upport/cpp' mkdir -p /usr/local/sdcc/bin ... /usr/bin/install -c ../../bin/sdas8051.exe `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdas8051.ex e|sed 's,x,x,'` strip `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdas8051.exe|sed 's,x,x,'` strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdas8051.exe'; reason: Permission d enied make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/sd as/as8051' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s das/asz80' ... strip `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdcclib.exe|sed 's,x,x,'` strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/sdcclib.exe'; reason: Permission de nied make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/su pport/librarian' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s das/asranlib' /usr/bin/install -c -d /usr/local/sdcc/bin /usr/bin/install -c ../../bin/asranlib.exe `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/asranlib.ex e|sed 's,x,x,'` strip `echo /usr/local/sdcc/bin/asranlib.exe|sed 's,x,x,'` strip: unable to rename '/usr/local/sdcc/bin/asranlib.exe'; reason: Permission d enied make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/sd as/asranlib' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/claude/work/software/pc/SDCC/sdcc-3.0.0-rc1/s upport/scripts' ... +++ Regards, Claude |