You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(94) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(133) |
Dec
(45) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(57) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(97) |
Aug
(104) |
Sep
(60) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(57) |
2002 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(80) |
Mar
(112) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(89) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(130) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(99) |
2003 |
Jan
(281) |
Feb
(141) |
Mar
(231) |
Apr
(109) |
May
(128) |
Jun
(166) |
Jul
(243) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(68) |
2004 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(84) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(168) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(51) |
Oct
(102) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(73) |
2005 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(117) |
Sep
(82) |
Oct
(65) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(85) |
2006 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(131) |
May
(92) |
Jun
(71) |
Jul
(71) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(77) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(55) |
2007 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(74) |
Oct
(83) |
Nov
(67) |
Dec
(39) |
2008 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(91) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(128) |
Sep
(188) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(41) |
2009 |
Jan
(145) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(117) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(65) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(36) |
2010 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(81) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(85) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(69) |
Dec
(32) |
2011 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(67) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(15) |
2012 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(46) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(51) |
2013 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(68) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(33) |
2014 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(76) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(26) |
2015 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(42) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(2) |
2016 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(38) |
Aug
(69) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(26) |
2017 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
|
Oct
(28) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2018 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(13) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
2019 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(7) |
2020 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(34) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(31) |
2021 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(15) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(5) |
2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(7) |
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2024 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Bernhard H. <ber...@ot...> - 2001-07-05 17:23:59
|
> I joined the list recently (a few days ago) so following the 'hints' > would not have been easy. ? 2nd line of your posting from Wed, 04 Jul 2001 10:25:03 +0100: >> I deleted reg552.h (see bug 210418), please use mcs51reg.h. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Bernhard |
From: Dai y. <dy...@ya...> - 2001-07-05 03:23:34
|
thanks for your replying. in my program there is the following code: #define min(a,b) ((a)<(b)?(a):(b)) typedef struct _ww{ int r; char e; }ww; ww w; ... ... int foo(... ...) { int t; ... ... t=min(t,w->r); ... ... } when I compile this promblem ,it appeared some error.what's wrong?can SDCC support this kind of writing? thank. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |
From: Bernhard H. <Ber...@ot...> - 2001-07-04 19:48:34
|
>Was this reason enough to delete reg552.h? Or are there other issues? Why don't you follow the hints? Did you ever have a look on mcs51reg.h? You would have noticed, that the P80C552 has been integrated into this file, each register and each bit is now defined. >I have built up my own .h from the documentation and all seems to work >fine at the moment. Great :-> Bernhard |
From: Luis C. <l.c...@18...> - 2001-07-04 09:32:14
|
> Subject: [Sdcc-user] reg552.h deleted > I deleted reg552.h (see bug 210418), please use mcs51reg.h. > Bernhard Bug: 210418 (Snipped from the Bug tracker) 'At the moment I'm trying to write code for a PCB80C552 with sdcc. In the Philips documentation there's AFAIK no T2CON-SFR at the 8xC552. But I think it is includes in the regs552.h!' The Philips doc (80C51 Family Derivatives - 8XC552/562 overview) as you correctly state does not include the T2CON sfr, but it does have the TM2CON sfr (at 0xEA). Was this reason enough to delete reg552.h? Or are there other issues? I have built up my own .h from the documentation and all seems to work fine at the moment. If you'd like it attached/submitted please let me know. Regards, Luis. -- Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act 2000 together with any and all Regulations in force pursuant to the Act One Eighty Software Ltd reserves the right to monitor any or all incoming or outgoing communications as provided for under the Act. Luis Commins Software Engineer OneEighty Software Ltd Tel: +44 (0)20 8680 8712 Cygnet House Fax: +44 (0)20 8680 8453 12-14 Sydenham Road CROYDON CR9 2ET l.c...@18... UK http://www.180sw.com |
From: Dai y. <dy...@ya...> - 2001-07-04 09:02:46
|
in my program there is a function need to return a structure,just like the following: typedef struct _ww{ ... ... }WW; ... ... WW foo(){ WW w; ... ... return w; } but the SDCC didn't support it.if it's necessary to write like this,how can i resolve this problem? thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |
From: Dai y. <dy...@ya...> - 2001-07-03 12:39:11
|
in my program nj.c,i defined an constant int a=2000.When i compiled nj.c,it appeared the error of 'constant is out of range'.how can i resolve this question without change the value of 'a'? thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |
From: Dai y. <dy...@ya...> - 2001-07-03 12:19:52
|
when I compiled a program re.c,it appeared the following error: re.c(129):error ***FATAL compiler internal Eror in file ¡®gen.c' line number '7256':got unknow point. i checked re.c,and i found in the line '129' there is only 'return;'.is it a bug of SDCC?or how to resolve this kind of error?can you help me out?thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |
From: Dai y. <dy...@ya...> - 2001-07-03 12:11:01
|
when I compiled one program af.c,It appears the following error: Segmentation fault. what's wrong?what can cause this error? can you help out?thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |
From: Bernhard H. <Ber...@ot...> - 2001-07-02 21:12:27
|
I deleted reg552.h (see bug 210418), please use mcs51reg.h. #define MICROCONTROLLER_P80C552 #include "mcs51reg.h" I'm sorry, the log message is nonsense. Bernhard |
From: Hoeben E. <in...@ho...> - 2001-07-01 10:32:57
|
Hi you all, I received an email from somebody in Indonesia. Maybe somebody of you can help him? Regards, Pieter Hoeben. Here is his email: >Van: je...@so... >Danke well voor jou oppleten >Hello >we're trying to study P89C51UBPN(P89C51RD+IN)family >Microcontroller. After looking and searching from web >to find Homebrew programmer for it.Until now didn't find. >So maybe you could help me that had seen of memory where >to find or info how to made it? I'm very needed to >load/burn ROMBOOT in chip and then play with serial >programming with chip(WINISP from Philips) and little >bit confuse us was the Chip ready ROMBOOT from Philips? >I think that homebrew using parallel programmer. >There was homebrew 8051 FLASH PROGRAMMER such as >pgm89 for Atmel(easy downloader) Parallel programming. >Could we used that????how about timing signal?? >Very very appreciate for your info and we're needed >very much. For now I didn't had dollars and as you >know that situation in East Indische(very ROTSOI) >every days dollars always up and up.NO rules,heel >verdrietig. >Hartelijke grooten van Jeckson >Best Regards >Jeckson >East Indische |
From: Ids v. d. P. <ids...@pl...> - 2001-06-29 17:17:37
|
From: Bruce B. <bb...@sy...> - 2001-06-28 18:00:32
|
At 10:14 6/28/2001 MST, Jose Martin Serrano Santiago wrote: >Did some body knows where can i buy some DS89c420 in the US? >Thanks! You could try Dallas/Maxim. They have been giving away parts at trade shows. We are working with Dallas to design the "official" development board for the C420. It will run in page mode 1, the highest speed mode with external memory. It will be finished later this summer. It has been delayed due to a few technical "surprises". Be sure to ask for the current errata list. Bruce Boyes ------- WWW.SYSTRONIX.COM ---------- Real embedded Java and much more High speed 8051 systems +1-801-534-1017 Salt Lake City, USA |
From: Jose M. S. S. <jms...@us...> - 2001-06-28 17:14:11
|
Did some body knows where can i buy some DS89c420 in the US? Thanks! Jose Martin Serrano Santiago jms...@us... |
From: Jose B. <mas...@ma...> - 2001-06-27 21:36:55
|
The P87C591 is a more or less recent uC from philips: CAN 2.0B, I2C , = ADC, etc all in a PLC44. Jose Barbosa |
From: Rod B. <rod_boyce@DMCWave.com> - 2001-06-27 19:46:04
|
I remember reading that the 80C591 was going out of production this was = a few years ago and maybe Philips found a new customer. I have one of = these chips at home if you need one I'll be happy to send it to whomever asks first. =20 Regards, Rod Boyce. -----Original Message----- From: Jos=E9 Barbosa [mailto:mas...@ma...] Sent: Wednesday, 27 June 2046 21:09 To: sdcc-user Subject: [Sdcc-user] P80c591 Is anybody dooing something with the p80c591 from Philips? I am about to start - because of the CAN. =20 Jos=E9 Barbosa |
From: Gunnar H. <Henne@oTRIs.de> - 2001-06-27 11:36:49
|
Hello, I used the mingw32 (www.mingw.org) compiler in a cygwin environment to build sdcc. Except the simulator/debugger it worked fine. The compiler can be installed on an arbitrary drive in the \sdcc directory. Your sources have to be on the same drive. You can download the binaries from http://www.combio.de/sdcc/sdcc-2001.06.27.mingw32.zip Greetings Gunnar |
From: <mas...@ma...> - 2001-06-27 09:11:59
|
Is anybody dooing something with the p80c591 from Philips? I am about to start - because of the CAN. Jos=E9 Barbosa |
From: <mas...@ma...> - 2001-06-27 08:59:55
|
Yesterday I tryed the Borland sdcc. - Renamed my original bin subdir. - Created a new empty bin. - Extracted the Borlanded zip files to a new bin. - All of the other subdirs containing includes and libs from the cygwin = remained unchanged. - And at last I could compile my test file and some others. I think it's a good idea that someone upload the Borland version of the = v222 sdcc. At present I am using the borland V221 sdcc with v222 include/lib files. = It seems working by now. Soon I will try your suggestions for installig properly cygwin. Thanks for the help from you all. Jose Barbosa |
From: Yongming W. <ym...@in...> - 2001-06-26 09:50:29
|
aGksDQoNCkkgd2FzIGp1c3QgaW52b2x2ZWQgaW4gYSBwcm9qZWN0IHRvIGNvbXBpbGUgpsxDL09T IGluIHNkY2MsIEkgcmVhZCBzb21lIHBhcGVyIG9mIHNkY2MsIGJ1dCBJIHN0aWxsIGhhdmUgbm8g aWRlYSBvZiBob3cgdG8gYmVnaW4uIHdvdWxkIHlvdSBwbGVhc2UgZ2l2ZSBtZSBzb21lIHN1Z2dl c3Rpb25zIG9mIGhvdyB0byBiZWdpbj8NCg0KUmVnYXJkcyANCg0KWU0NCg== |
From: Peter B. <alt...@go...> - 2001-06-26 09:35:14
|
> > > > I think it would be usefull for us to figure out what is going on if > > > > you would include output of the command too. > > > > > > Try "sdcc jose1.c -V" > > > > How can redirect the output to file in SDCC? (Or how can paging the > > CRT output? The Pause button and "|more" doesn't work to me.) > Use Linux ;-). Yes, I use Linux, too (a little). The results of the example below similar to Win version: > > char A; > > void main (void) > > { > > A = 123; > > while(1) > > { > > A = ~A; > > } > > } > > > > "sdcc test.c > out.txt" generates only CR + LF in out.txt. Linux: only CR in out.txt. > > change "void" to "vooid", the out.txt is: > > "test.c(2) parse error: token -> 'main' ; column 10" Linux: out.txt has 0 byte size. > > change one of "A" to "AA", the out.txt has 0 byte size! Linux: out.txt has 0 byte size. Regards, Peter |
From: Gary M. <Gar...@st...> - 2001-06-26 09:17:19
|
On Jun 26, 12:18am, ka...@tu... wrote: > Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] SDCC - 2th first try > > > > The Borland pkgs have some missing pieces: > * can't compile the src pkg from scratch(makefiles incomplete, native > tool set incomplete(no lex/bison thing)). > * can't compile the sdcc libraries(no win32 makefiles). > * can't run simulator(No win32 support). > Whereas with Cygwin you can do all of the above. > (of coarse a stripped down Cygwin probably has less value > than a Borland compiled set.) > > I do like the idea of putting together a Borland Windows > binary package. I think there are a lot of windows > people that want a quick download they can > setup in 10-15 minutes. And getting a full-cygwin, and > compiling the sources(and dealing with a bash prompt) is > a bit much for a lot of people.(Takes damn near forever > too!) > > Most of the win binary distributions so far have not been > thought out real well(just the .exe files for example). > A better win offering can be done, it just requires some > work to get right. > > Or we could just wait a few years until everyone is > running Linux :) > > karl. > >-- End of excerpt from ka...@tu... I hope that when the next official release of SDCC occurs, that someone creates a Borland release. I have been using V2.2.1 for some time. I had problems in the very beginning only because there was no documentation. I discovered that paths are hard coded into the Borland code. If you use the right paths "c:/sdcc/local" (I think!) then it all works without the hassle of -I and -L switches. It even occurred to me that the SDCC compiler should check some environmental variables (for example SDCC_BIN and SDCC_LIB) in order to work out where to find the includes, libraries and support binaries so that the user is free to use whatever directory structure they prefer. In order to find out why the sdcc compiler was running very slow (*) I had to be able to re-compile the package. In order to generate the C files which required lex and yacc I installed SDCC under Linux. The sources compiled first time. I then copied the missing C files over to the DOS partition and was able to complete the Borland compilation. If someone does a Borland release, don't forget to included these "special" C sources. (*) I discovered the known problem of files being created in TEMP and never been deleted. When I looked I found thousands! Anyway thanks to Sandeep and the development team. --Gary -- --Gary STMicroelectronics, 1000 Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4SQ, UK. Tel: +44 1454 462639 FAX: +44 1454 617910 |
From: David C. <da...@co...> - 2001-06-26 08:24:58
|
Hi, Downloaded SDCC 2.1 but I can't get it to compile anything. I keep = seeing references to 'docs' but I can't find them on the various sites = and there is no documentation with the zip file I downloaded. I know = it's probably staring me in the face somewhere but it would be really = good if someone could tell me where exactly. Best regards, David Cowan |
From: Karl B. <ka...@tu...> - 2001-06-26 05:24:30
|
The Borland pkgs have some missing pieces: * can't compile the src pkg from scratch(makefiles incomplete, native tool set incomplete(no lex/bison thing)). * can't compile the sdcc libraries(no win32 makefiles). * can't run simulator(No win32 support). Whereas with Cygwin you can do all of the above. (of coarse a stripped down Cygwin probably has less value than a Borland compiled set.) I do like the idea of putting together a Borland Windows binary package. I think there are a lot of windows people that want a quick download they can setup in 10-15 minutes. And getting a full-cygwin, and compiling the sources(and dealing with a bash prompt) is a bit much for a lot of people.(Takes damn near forever too!) Most of the win binary distributions so far have not been thought out real well(just the .exe files for example). A better win offering can be done, it just requires some work to get right. Or we could just wait a few years until everyone is running Linux :) karl. ----------------------------- On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:48:23 +1200 Rod Boyce <rod_boyce@DMCWave.com> wrote: > What is wrong with the Borland package for windows then you do not need= any > cygwin packages at all? This gets the compiler working with minimum of= fuss > on a windows environment. I have used it a few times without any troub= le. >=20 >=20 > Rod >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl Bongers [mailto:ka...@tu...] > Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 01:22 > To: Jos=E9 Barbosa > Cc: sdc...@li... > Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] SDCC - 2th first try >=20 > Hi Jos=E9, >=20 > I know what the problem is! The single file from > cygwin(cygwin1.dll) is not enough for a working system. > I was testing this, and when I > only use cygwin1.dll, it generated just a 1 line .cdb file. >=20 > I could have swore I tested this out before, and I put notes > on my web-site that said you could do this. So I dug a bit > more, > and it looks like you need sh.exe in your executable path, > and then there is a registry setting that tells it > where the /tmp file is that the setup program must setup. >=20 > Anyway, Here is my suggestion: > Go to the http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin site and download > the Cygwin package. This is a really big package(100M), > that > is why I was interested in a sub-set of it(just the > cygwin1.dll) > package. The latest package lets you download a small > setup.exe > program, which lets you pick components you want. So if you > don't want to download the full 100M, just grab the parts > you > need. The minimum is probably the "cygwin" package alone. > I > don't know how big this is, I'll try a fresh download today > to > find out a bit more. >=20 > The full package is great, includes a lot of neat GNU tools, > so if > you got the bandwidth, grab the whole thing! >=20 > Oh, and remove the existing cygwin1.dll so it doesn't get > confused. >=20 > cheers, >=20 > Karl. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Jos=E9 Barbosa wrote: >=20 > > Hi! > > Last week I posted a question about my first try with > sdcc. > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > Well, I'm beginning to be frustrated with the fact that I > cannot start=20 > > doing anything. > > So, let's start from the begining. > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > 1 - My machines are W2000 and W98 PCs. > > 2 - I downloaded the last version: > SDCC_V222_preMS_160401.zip from OKR site. > > 3 - Also the file cygwin1dll_1V17.zip ( I don't know > what is the=20 > > purpose of this file , but is there) > > 4 - I extracted the files to the c:\usr\local\ dirs and it > created the=20 > > subdirs. > > 5 - Extracted the file 'cygwin1.dll' to c:\usr\local\bin . > > 6 - Changed the path to include: c:\usr\local\bin . > > 7 - Restarted the machines. > > 8 - tried to compiled one or two examples downloaded also > from the OKR site. > > 9 - The only output obtained was a .cdb file with just a > few bytes=20 > > containing the text: M:name_of_the_file > > 10 - tried several command lines: > > sdcc --debug --stack-after-data --model-large > -c jose1.c > > sdcc --debug -Ic:\usr\local\share\sdcc\include >=20 > > -Lc:\usr\local\share\sdcc\lib\large --stack-after-data > --model-large -c=20 > > jose1.c > > sdcc jose1.c > > etc.. > > 11 - tried with a very simple programm: > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > >=20 > > #include <regc51fx.h> > > =20 > > void main( void ) > > { > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > while(1) > > { > > _asm > > nop > > _endasm; > > } > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > } > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > 12 - And the result was the same. > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > >=20 > > Giving the fact that a lot of people did a lot of work to > made it to=20 > > function and that I can=B4t reach any result, my question > is: what did I=20 > > miss ? > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > I will appreciate any help from you. > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > Best regards =20 > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > Jos=E9 Barbosa =20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user |
From: Rod B. <rod_boyce@DMCWave.com> - 2001-06-25 19:48:52
|
What is wrong with the Borland package for windows then you do not need = any cygwin packages at all? This gets the compiler working with minimum of = fuss on a windows environment. I have used it a few times without any = trouble. Rod -----Original Message----- From: Karl Bongers [mailto:ka...@tu...] Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 01:22 To: Jos=E9 Barbosa Cc: sdc...@li... Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] SDCC - 2th first try Hi Jos=E9, I know what the problem is! The single file from cygwin(cygwin1.dll) is not enough for a working system. I was testing this, and when I only use cygwin1.dll, it generated just a 1 line .cdb file. I could have swore I tested this out before, and I put notes on my web-site that said you could do this. So I dug a bit more, and it looks like you need sh.exe in your executable path, and then there is a registry setting that tells it where the /tmp file is that the setup program must setup. Anyway, Here is my suggestion: Go to the http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin site and download the Cygwin package. This is a really big package(100M), that is why I was interested in a sub-set of it(just the cygwin1.dll) package. The latest package lets you download a small setup.exe program, which lets you pick components you want. So if you don't want to download the full 100M, just grab the parts you need. The minimum is probably the "cygwin" package alone. I don't know how big this is, I'll try a fresh download today to find out a bit more. The full package is great, includes a lot of neat GNU tools, so if you got the bandwidth, grab the whole thing! Oh, and remove the existing cygwin1.dll so it doesn't get confused. cheers, Karl. Jos=E9 Barbosa wrote: > Hi! > Last week I posted a question about my first try with sdcc. >=20 > =20 >=20 > Well, I'm beginning to be frustrated with the fact that I cannot start=20 > doing anything. > So, let's start from the begining. >=20 > =20 >=20 > 1 - My machines are W2000 and W98 PCs. > 2 - I downloaded the last version: SDCC_V222_preMS_160401.zip from OKR site. > 3 - Also the file cygwin1dll_1V17.zip ( I don't know what is the=20 > purpose of this file , but is there) > 4 - I extracted the files to the c:\usr\local\ dirs and it created the=20 > subdirs. > 5 - Extracted the file 'cygwin1.dll' to c:\usr\local\bin . > 6 - Changed the path to include: c:\usr\local\bin . > 7 - Restarted the machines. > 8 - tried to compiled one or two examples downloaded also from the OKR site. > 9 - The only output obtained was a .cdb file with just a few bytes=20 > containing the text: M:name_of_the_file > 10 - tried several command lines: > sdcc --debug --stack-after-data --model-large -c jose1.c > sdcc --debug -Ic:\usr\local\share\sdcc\include > -Lc:\usr\local\share\sdcc\lib\large --stack-after-data --model-large -c=20 > jose1.c > sdcc jose1.c > etc.. > 11 - tried with a very simple programm: >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > #include <regc51fx.h> > =20 > void main( void ) > { >=20 > =20 >=20 > while(1) > { > _asm > nop > _endasm; > } >=20 > =20 >=20 > } >=20 > =20 >=20 > =20 >=20 > =20 >=20 > 12 - And the result was the same. >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > Giving the fact that a lot of people did a lot of work to made it to=20 > function and that I can=B4t reach any result, my question is: what did I=20 > miss ? >=20 > =20 >=20 > I will appreciate any help from you. >=20 > =20 >=20 > Best regards =20 >=20 > =20 >=20 > Jos=E9 Barbosa =20 >=20 _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdc...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user |
From: Peter B. <alt...@go...> - 2001-06-25 14:04:02
|
> > I think it would be usefull for us to figure out what is going on if > > you would include output of the command too. > > Try "sdcc jose1.c -V" How can redirect the output to file in SDCC? (Or how can paging the CRT output? The Pause button and "|more" doesn't work to me.) Just a simple example: char A; void main (void) { A = 123; while(1) { A = ~A; } } "sdcc test.c > out.txt" generates only CR + LF in out.txt. change "void" to "vooid", the out.txt is: "test.c(2) parse error: token -> 'main' ; column 10" change one of "A" to "AA", the out.txt has 0 byte size! Regards, Peter |