From: Michael H. <mic...@ju...> - 2001-08-27 06:55:07
|
So, how about it? As I understand it the major bugs that caused us to abort last time are fixed, and both the mcs51 and z80 ports seem to be in decent shape as per the regression tests. I'm keen. -- Michael |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2001-08-27 07:22:19
|
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Michael Hope wrote: > So, how about it? As I understand it the major bugs that caused us to > abort last time are fixed, and both the mcs51 and z80 ports seem to be in > decent shape as per the regression tests. > > I'm keen. Do you want to port the pCode to the z80 first? Just kidding... I vote for 2.3 release sooner than later since I'd be reluctant to move any pcode stuff in to src/ if a release was imminent. Scott |
From: <da...@kd...> - 2001-08-27 15:51:41
|
On 27 Aug, Michael Hope wrote: > So, how about it? As I understand it the major bugs that caused us to > abort last time are fixed, and both the mcs51 and z80 ports seem to be in > decent shape as per the regression tests. > > I'm keen. > > -- Michael > 2.3.0RC1 ? -- Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Helton, KD0YU - da...@re... - http://www.kd0yu.com Real World Computing - 319-386-4041 - 8am-5pm CST Linux/Novell/NT | Servers/Workstations | Consulting | Internet Technologies --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet |
From: Michael H. <mic...@ju...> - 2001-08-27 16:20:25
|
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 da...@kd... wrote: > On 27 Aug, Michael Hope wrote: > > So, how about it? As I understand it the major bugs that caused us to > > abort last time are fixed, and both the mcs51 and z80 ports seem to be in > > decent shape as per the regression tests. > > > > I'm keen. > > > > -- Michael > > > > 2.3.0RC1 ? Yip, we can do candidates. The automated build has stopped due to me going over quota, but once it's back up and going I can spin candidates reasonably easialy. One problem was that I couldn't build ucsim under cygwin. I don't know what to do about this and I really haven't done my due dilligance of trying to track it down. -- Michael |
From: Russel W. <ru...@ru...> - 2001-08-27 18:32:00
Attachments:
compilation.txt
|
Bug 455612 reports: > Using Cygwin on Windows98, ucsim will not build: > > c++ -g -O2 -ggdb -pipe -Wall -I. -I../.. -c main.cc -o main.o > In file included from main.cc:15: > frontend.hh:7: term.h: No such file or directory > main.cc: In function `int main(int, char **)': > main.cc:52: implicit declaration of function `int getopt(...)' Bernhard has written in response to this: > 1. uCsim compiles under Cygwin, I've run the regression > tests with it. > 2. main.cc belongs to serialview, which indeed does not > compile under Cygwin. This doesn't matter, because you need > named pipes to use serialview it as intended, and there are > no named pipes in the current Cygwin version 1.3.2. Micheal has written: > One problem was that I couldn't build ucsim under cygwin. I don't know > what to do about this and I really haven't done my due dilligance of > trying to track it down. I'm afraid I'm sort of with Michael on this though Bernhard is not wrong, see the attached results from make. Although the s51.exe binary appears in /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/sim/ucsim/s51.src, it does not get into /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/bin and is not installed during "make install" so to all intents and purposes it does not get made. I guess the issues are: Should ../s51.so be built in /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/sim/ucsim/s51.src for a Cygwin system? Should main.o be made in /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/sim/ucsim/gui.src/serio.src for a Cygwin system. These are the (failed) actions that are breaking the ucsim make sequence. -- Russel. ===================================================================== Dr Russel Winder +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK ru...@ru... |
From: Bernhard H. <Ber...@be...> - 2001-08-27 18:58:27
|
>I'm afraid I'm sort of with Michael on this though Bernhard is not >wrong, see the attached results from make. Although the s51.exe binary >appears in /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/sim/ucsim/s51.src, it does not get into >/cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/bin and is not installed during "make install" so >to all intents and purposes it does not get made. > >I guess the issues are: > > Should ../s51.so be built in /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/sim/ucsim/s51.src > for a Cygwin system? > > Should main.o be made in > /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/sim/ucsim/gui.src/serio.src for a Cygwin > system. >These are the (failed) actions that are breaking the ucsim make >sequence. Ok, you persuaded me :-) I will have a look. Maybe it's possible to exclude serialview from the build under Cygwin. Bernhard |
From: Bernhard H. <Ber...@be...> - 2001-08-28 21:00:09
|
Fixed. Serialview is built on Cygwin, but it won't run (Cygwib DLLVersion 1.3.2): >mkfifo(): Error number 88 occourred: Function not implemented The bigger problem is the shared library s51.so, which can't be built under Cygwin. I introduced a hack in configure.in to avoid building of this libary. I'm an absolute beginner with autoconf, perhaps somebody else can have a look on my changes. The size of the generated file configure has doubled - don't know if anybody cares. > >Although the s51.exe binary > >appears in /cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/sim/ucsim/s51.src, it does not get into > >/cygdrive/c/SDCC_CVS/bin and is not installed during "make install" so > >to all intents and purposes it does not get made. Bernhard |