From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-10-17 18:55:12
|
Hi Philipp, no luck with LyX: after your update of sdccman.lyx the sdcc doc package is not built any more on the snapshot build machine :-( I already serched for the the offending 'Ì Operator', but I couldn't find it. My idea is to take the sdccman.lyx version before your update end re-apply the changes, this time using LyX version 1.6.x instead if 2.0.1 you used... Will you take care or should I do it? Here is the error message from snapshot build: ----8<---- lyx -e latex sdccman.lyx; Warning: Index sorting failed ---------------------------------------- LyX's automatic index sorting algorithm faced problems with the entry 'Ì Operator'. Please specify the sorting of this entry manually, as explained in the User Guide. Warning: Index sorting failed ---------------------------------------- LyX's automatic index sorting algorithm faced problems with the entry 'Ì Operator'. Please specify the sorting of this entry manually, as explained in the User Guide. pdflatex sdccman >/dev/null 2>/dev/null make[1]: *** [sdccman.pdf] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/sdcc-builder/build/sdcc-build/amd64-unknown-linux2.5.build/sdcc/doc' ---->8---- Borut |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-10-17 21:51:52
|
Am 17.10.2011 20:54, schrieb Borut Ražem: > Hi Philipp, > > no luck with LyX: after your update of sdccman.lyx the sdcc doc package > is not built any more on the snapshot build machine :-( > I already serched for the the offending 'Ì Operator', but I couldn't > find it. > > My idea is to take the sdccman.lyx version before your update end > re-apply the changes, this time using LyX version 1.6.x instead if 2.0.1 > you used... > Hmm, I used the export to 1.6 format function of LyX thsi time, so I don't know what caused this. Could you try to fix it? Philipp |
From: Robert L. <Rob...@t-...> - 2011-10-18 06:04:07
|
Hello Philip, Borut, I don't know much or anything about lyx, yet, it seems to me, if you export from 2.0 to 1.6 then lyx uses a script "lyx2lyx" to do the conversion and this script seems always and everytime to prepend a preamble +\begin_preamble +% Added by lyx2lyx +% for proper underlining ... +\end_preamble thus if you export more than once, you will have this preamble several times, causing command redefinitions and failure. for reference see for example http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx...@li.../msg165347.html looks to me, 2.0 is to fresh, better don't use it at all. i suppose you can fix and get away, if you drop this preamble by hand. Robert Philipp Klaus Krause <pk...@sp...> writes: > Am 17.10.2011 20:54, schrieb Borut Ražem: >> Hi Philipp, >> >> no luck with LyX: after your update of sdccman.lyx the sdcc doc package >> is not built any more on the snapshot build machine :-( >> I already serched for the the offending 'Ì Operator', but I couldn't >> find it. >> >> My idea is to take the sdccman.lyx version before your update end >> re-apply the changes, this time using LyX version 1.6.x instead if 2.0.1 >> you used... >> > > Hmm, I used the export to 1.6 format function of LyX thsi time, so I > don't know what caused this. Could you try to fix it? > > Philipp > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-10-18 19:33:27
|
On 10/18/2011 08:03 AM, Robert Larice wrote: > Hello Philip, Borut, > > I don't know much or anything about lyx, > yet, > it seems to me, if you export from 2.0 to 1.6 > then lyx uses a script "lyx2lyx" to do the conversion > and this script seems always and everytime to prepend > a preamble > > +\begin_preamble > +% Added by lyx2lyx > +% for proper underlining > ... > +\end_preamble > > thus if you export more than once, you will have this > preamble several times, causing command redefinitions and failure. I also noticed the duplicated preamble and suspected that this might be the problem, but I didn't see any correlation with the error message mantioning 'Ì Operator'. Now I removed everything added by LyX 2.0.1. > for reference see for example > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx...@li.../msg165347.html > > looks to me, 2.0 is to fresh, better don't use it at all. > > i suppose you can fix and get away, if you drop this > preamble by hand. Done. Robert, thanks for your help! > Robert > > > Philipp Klaus Krause<pk...@sp...> writes: > >> Am 17.10.2011 20:54, schrieb Borut Ražem: >>> Hi Philipp, >>> >>> no luck with LyX: after your update of sdccman.lyx the sdcc doc package >>> is not built any more on the snapshot build machine :-( >>> I already serched for the the offending 'Ì Operator', but I couldn't >>> find it. >>> >>> My idea is to take the sdccman.lyx version before your update end >>> re-apply the changes, this time using LyX version 1.6.x instead if 2.0.1 >>> you used... >>> >> Hmm, I used the export to 1.6 format function of LyX thsi time, so I >> don't know what caused this. Could you try to fix it? Hopefully done. Tommorow's snapshot bild will show the truth... Borut |