From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2008-02-22 19:52:59
|
Hi Philipp, on the sdcc web page and in the document doc/README.txt is written that gbz80 target is no longer maintained. Is this still true or you intent to maintain the gbz80 target too? Borut |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2008-02-23 08:39:03
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Borut Razem schrieb: > Hi Philipp, > > on the sdcc web page and in the document doc/README.txt is written that > gbz80 target is no longer maintained. Is this still true or you intent > to maintain the gbz80 target too? > > Borut It's still true. I don't know much about the gbz80. While I might try to fix a gbz80 bug once in a while (like #1806565) I don't intent to maintain the port. I'll try not to break the gbz80 port when improving the Z80 port (or fix the bugs I caused once someone finds them in the gbz80 port), but I don't think I could do gbz80-specififc optimizations. Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHv9tmbtUV+xsoLpoRAhg1AKDRXsDjaU0T2XXvqaeGpMZAr1UV7wCfXlXS cn9hstqembX8gyCLDYBg0KI= =4oGK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |