From: Johan Knol <johan.knol@id...> - 2001-05-14 14:28:49
For some reasons this message didn't end up in the list, so here it goes
----- Original Message -----
From: Johan Knol <johan.knol@...>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [sdcc-devel] Re : Possible Array bug <foo[foo+2]=10>
> The fix looks good, it generates a redundant move, but the
> generated code looks good to me.... do you see anything wrong with
> it ?
It looks nice. However the new peephole 223 (which had a typo) is an exact
copy of 221b that didn't work either because bindVar() swallowed the
trailing ')'. I fixed that in SDCCpeeph.c:bindVar(). Also removed 222 and
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.