Re: [sdcc-devel] typedef semantics

[Bernhard H. <ber...@be...>]

> typedef char * ptr_t;
>
> char * xdata * p;
> ptr_t xdata * q;
>
> volatile char c;
>
> foo () {
>   c=**p;
>   c=**q; // error: pointer required
> }

I've a very similiar problem here, it should have been my next bug report
:-)

> Without the "xdata" everthing is fine. Is this allowed?
Why not?
IAR and Keil compile it without error or warning and the expected result.

Bernhard