From: Steve S. <ste...@gm...> - 2024-08-02 16:33:34
|
Why not? I mean, it's not like someone will have too much expectations ;-) Therefore, if it doesn't impede any other arch, I don't see any reason not to. Cheers, -- Steve On Fri, Aug 2, 2024, 15:32 Philipp Klaus Krause <pk...@sp...> wrote: > The f8 is still a work in progress; the instruction set won't change > much, but the opcode map will. No hardware implementation exists. There > is Verilog code that can be used to have an f8 on two FPGA boards > (tested, can run simple programs, such as Drhystone and Whetstone). > Currently, the f8 port lives in the f8 branch (apart from uCsim in trunk > having f8 support). > Would it be ok to put the f8 port into trunk soon? > > Philipp > > > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel > -- Steve SCHNEPP |