From: Oleg E. <ole...@t-...> - 2024-07-09 06:39:44
|
On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 07:16 +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > Am 09.07.24 um 04:37 schrieb Oleg Endo: > > > > This is a very good point! You are right. I dug out my notes on that > > matter from a while ago. This is what I arrived at for a possibly improved > > mcs51 ABI: > > > > > > […] > > I've opened a ticket: > https://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/feature-requests/934/, I suggest you post > your notes there, so we will rememeber to have your proposal among the > ones we test empirically, once we've reached the point where we can > easily do so. > > Your link doesn't work .. no idea what's with that, but it's https://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/feature-requests/934/ I've copy-pasted the contents of my mail there. Sorry, but source forge's ticket UI is terrible and takes me too much time to "format properly". Please also add the other related ticket https://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/feature-requests/79/ Best regards, Oleg Endo |