From: Felix S. <fe...@sa...> - 2024-04-05 11:30:01
|
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:54:21PM +0200, Steve Schnepp wrote: > My naive question is "why another git hoster?" can't we leverage the SF.net > git repo ? > I do not have much issues with SF.net hosting outside that it uses SVN ;-) Here's some food for thought. Without write permissions you can't use a git repo to share patches. Codeberg allows private clones as a kind of workaround for this, and has a "clone repo" button that streamlines the use. Also, in order to get in touch with SDCC devs via sf, you need to accept sf terms and conditions and privacy policy. This is not needed when using codeberg. I would expect the mailing list to accept messages from non-subscribers, and allows attachments. Note how this will only help contributors willing and able to deal with patches manually, and also use email. cheers felix |