From: Richard G. <ri...@re...> - 2011-02-01 17:29:12
|
I'll second that sentiment. I've used SDCC for several Z80-based projects running on old 1980's equipment, giving it a new lease of life in the modern world; kit that would otherwise be scrap. It's relatively memory-hungry compared to assembler (of course!), but memory is cheap these days! On Tuesday 01 February 2011 15:51:06 Harley Laue wrote: > I don't know if you get many emails from users thanking the developers > for all their hard work, but I thought I'd go ahead and do it. So > thanks for SDCC. > > I'm currently using the Z80 port. It's allowed me to use C on a system > where most others have been required to use 100% assembly. Not sure > how far I can take it, but in about two nights I've been able to > recreate a very very small demo that took me closer to 2 weeks the > first time around (possibly because I was still learning how the > system works, and was the first time I've written anything in 100% Z80 > asm.) > > Anyways, SDCC seems to be making my life easier, so thanks again for > all the hard work. I hope to see more good things from this project :) > -- Richard. PGP Key-id: 0x5AB3D350 Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. -- Mark Twain |