From: Borut R. <bor...@si...> - 2010-09-11 15:38:16
|
Here is my proposition for sdcc 3.0.0 release schedule: 2010-09-26: RC1 2010-10-10: RC2 2010-10-10: Release If nobody else is willing to take the role of release manager, I'll do it. Waiting for your comments... Borut On 08/26/2010 08:22 PM, Maarten Brock wrote: > Dear Developers, > > Today Philipp and I have reached below the magic border > of 100 bugs again. It was hard work since while working > on them several new were also reported or found. I > sincerely hope not too many hidden new ones have been > introduced. > > I still have 38 bugs on my list that I would like to see > fixed before doing a 3.0.0 release but I think that is > not feasible. Half of them were reported after the 2.9.0 > release. Should they get priority or the other way > around? > > Still I would like we'd start discussing a release, so > this year will not go by without one. > > Maarten > > >> Hi Borut, >> >> My main interest with SDCC is to remove as many bugs as >> possible. I also prefer< 100 for the release. I must >> admit I haven't looked at the wiki bug list for a long >> time. The bugs I'm currently looking into are not even >> on it. >> >> Maarten >> >> >>> Hi sdcc developers, >>> >>> I'm near to the end of " change sdcc libraries license to GPL+LE" task. >>> >>> There still some sdcc library files without changed licenses because: >>> >>> * the authors (copyright holders) haven't respond me with the >>> agreement for license change. I intent to try to contact them >>> again, with a statement that if I won't get the answer in two >>> weeks, I'll assume that they agree with the license change. >>> What do you think about this option? >>> * the files were automatically generated. This is mostly related to >>> pic / pic16 device definition files. Who should be the copyright >>> holder for such files: the person who wrote the conversion script, >>> the person who made the first svn commit of such a file or ...? >>> >>> I would really like to know your opinions, so please respond to this mail! >>> >>> In the mean time we can start the discussion about the sdcc 3.0.0 >>> release. There are quite some bugs on the SDCC 2.0.0 Release list at >>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.0.0%20Release. Does >>> anybody intent to fix them? >>> >>> Currently there are 112 open bugs in the bug tracker. I would really >>> like to keep this number below 100 for the release. >>> >>> I would like to know about your plans, so again: please respond to this >>> mail! >>> >>> Borut >>> |