Re: [Sdcc-user] configuring microchips in the really high memory spaces

[William F. <wd...@mi...>]

Thank you    Vaclav,

       I never noticed before that I was using the wrong addresses   
0x30000 range  instead of 0x300000  
      
       duh !

       FYI:  the error message I was getting was :
    "Assertion failed: data & MEM_USED_MASK, file lst.c, line 188"


    Program compiles  when  the extra zeros are inserted and when 
changed from const to code  and changed from 16bit values to 8bit values.

Processor is   PIC 18f4620

$ sdcc -v
SDCC : mcs51/gbz80/z80/avr/ds390/pic16/pic14/TININative/xa51/ds400/hc08 
2.9.1 #5471 (Jun 30 2009) (MINGW32)

this code  worked :

code char  __at (0x300001) config1 = 0x06; // HS + PLL(*4),  unused
code uint8_t  __at (0x300002) config2 = 0x14; // powerup=on brownout=2.0V,
code uint8_t  __at (0x300003) config3 = 0x13; // watchdog enabled, 
scaled by 512
code char  __at (0x300005) config5 = 0x81; // stack over-underflow 
causes reset, no extended, low voltage prg =off
code char  __at (0x300006) config6 = 0x81; //
code char  __at (0x300008) config8 = 0x0f; // no protection of code
code char  __at (0x300009) config9 = 0xc0; // no protection of code
code char  __at (0x30000A) configA = 0x0f; // no protection of table writes
code char  __at (0x30000B) configB = 0xE0; //
code char  __at (0x30000C) configC = 0x0f; // no protection of table writes
code char  __at (0x30000D) configD = 0x40; // no protection of table reads

Awesome :)