From: Raphael N. <rn...@we...> - 2006-12-18 11:18:51
|
Hi again, > It seems that we have a tie... Anybody else having a vote? :-) Well, me again. I am wrong, Frieder is probably correct. I did not realize that the call to incrementpx() occured before dereferencing... Furthermore, volatile in the place I indicated does not help too much. So this is a bug---which vanishes if the storage class __xdata is removed. Sorry for my premature comment, Raphael |