and encourage the portability from XC8 and others to SDCC in the future.
Is There someone analyzing the document?
Specially the Chapter 2, about CCI (Common C Interface)
Think that some changes in the newest SDCC version are very near to this
idea, i.e. CONFIG pragma
Well... IMHO, could be good to follow the same syntax to promote a standard
We are not so far this. I.e. __asm could have an replace macro as asm()
(2.5.15 at that doc), but interrupts declarations are so far this that I
cannot think how to do this.
Antonio Augusto Todo Bom Neto