On 12. 05. 2013 13:36, Maarten Brock
> > But your script has quite
> > - I used the osx snapshot
> I don't know what do you mean
with "without i386" but Erik already
> explained the situation. The OS
X release builds were based on PPC
I meant the snapshot named
instead of the one use in the script
which has 'i386' in its name.
I see, you used the ppc snapshot, which I prefer. The script uses
the i386 snapshot probably because ppc snapshot was not available in
the time when the 2.2.0 release was done.
> > - I did not remove
sdcc/include and sdcc/lib
> They don't include anything
useful sor SDCC, so they should be removed.
> > - I did not rename the
> > - I did not repack the src
> > - I did not copy Changelog
and README for windows
> > - And why is the
doumentation part disabled for windows?
> ??? It is not, see "unzip
> function repack_win().
But it's (was) inside 'if false'
Yes, it was, now it is not any more.
> > - And why is most
PRocessing # commented out?
> In the script I sent you has
several things commented out or disabled. I
> attached the corrected version,
but I didn't test it!
> > I am confused.
> I hope that my answers
decreased your confusion ;-)
> > Furthermore would it not
be wise to put this script in subversion
> > (e.g.
> Probably yes: I was the only
one who used it until now.
> Actually I forgot that it is already
I should have noticed that. I feel stupid.
Me too ;-)
Anyway, I'm testing the
script and adapting it to include the x64 windows version
now. I expect an RC3 to come out soon.
There's one more thing: can
we still create a known_bugs.html file from the new system?
Yes, I updated the generating script. The knownbugs.html file is
included in doc snapshot packages and it is automatically included
in the release (candidate) package by the script.