Hi sdcc developers,
I'm near to the end of "
sdcc libraries license to GPL+LE" task.
There still some sdcc library files without changed licenses because:
I would really like to know your opinions, so please respond to this
authors (copyright holders) haven't respond me with the agreement for
license change. I intent to try to contact them again, with a statement
that if I won't get the answer in two weeks, I'll assume that they
agree with the license change.
What do you think about this option?
files were automatically generated. This is mostly related to pic /
pic16 device definition files. Who should be the copyright holder for
such files: the person who wrote the conversion script, the person who
made the first svn commit of such a file or ...?
In the mean time we can start the discussion about the sdcc 3.0.0
release. There are quite some bugs on the SDCC 2.0.0 Release list at
Does anybody intent to fix them?
Currently there are 112 open bugs in the bug tracker. I would really
like to keep this number below 100 for the release.
I would like to know about your plans, so again: please respond to this