Re: [Scwm-devs] Re: done testing key-mover-xtest.scm

[Greg B. <ba...@cs...>]

To test it, for one. :-)

Greg

Scott Lenser <sl...@cs...> writes:

> > Scott Lenser <sl...@cs...> writes:
> > 
> > > Ah, I see.  I didn't realize one was more robust than the other.  I didn't
> > > actually look to see how they were implemented much.  Couldn't this
> > > be folded into the move-pointer primitive so that you always get the
> > > best one that your version of X supports?  In any case, the function
> > > to move the virtual viewports is identical between the two versions.
> > 
> > It's possible, but sometimes you specifically want one or the other, so
> > the "smart" one would have to be another layer of abstraction.  The
> > stuff that's truly duplicated definitely should be factored out into
> > something separate.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Greg
> > 
> 
> When would you want the non-xtest one if it the xtest one is available?
> 
> - Scott