Re: [Scwm-devs] Re: done testing key-mover-xtest.scm

[Scott L. <sl...@cs...>]

> Scott Lenser <sl...@cs...> writes:
> 
> > Ah, I see.  I didn't realize one was more robust than the other.  I didn't
> > actually look to see how they were implemented much.  Couldn't this
> > be folded into the move-pointer primitive so that you always get the
> > best one that your version of X supports?  In any case, the function
> > to move the virtual viewports is identical between the two versions.
> 
> It's possible, but sometimes you specifically want one or the other, so
> the "smart" one would have to be another layer of abstraction.  The
> stuff that's truly duplicated definitely should be factored out into
> something separate.
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg
> 

When would you want the non-xtest one if it the xtest one is available?

- Scott