[Scwm-devs] Re: done testing key-mover-xtest.scm

[Greg B. <ba...@cs...>]

Scott Lenser <sl...@cs...> writes:

> Ah, I see.  I didn't realize one was more robust than the other.  I didn't
> actually look to see how they were implemented much.  Couldn't this
> be folded into the move-pointer primitive so that you always get the
> best one that your version of X supports?  In any case, the function
> to move the virtual viewports is identical between the two versions.

It's possible, but sometimes you specifically want one or the other, so
the "smart" one would have to be another layer of abstraction.  The
stuff that's truly duplicated definitely should be factored out into
something separate.

Thanks,
Greg