[Scwm-devs] Re: done testing key-mover-xtest.scm

[Scott L. <sl...@cs...>]

Ah, I see.  I didn't realize one was more robust than the other.  I didn't
actually look to see how they were implemented much.  Couldn't this
be folded into the move-pointer primitive so that you always get the
best one that your version of X supports?  In any case, the function
to move the virtual viewports is identical between the two versions.

- Scott

> But it uses the xtest extension, right?  This is a more reliable way to
> move the cursor around if (and only if) your X server supports the XTest
> extension.
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg
> 
> Scott Lenser <sl...@cs...> writes:
> 
> > Works fine.  :-)
> > 
> > Complete duplicate of functionality in key-mover.scm. :-(
> > 
> > - Scott