From: Scott L. <sl...@cs...> - 2002-04-01 07:08:18
|
I don't know, I didn't bother to test it. I just reverted to the old pager for now and recorded it as another thing to fix before the next release. I know the drawing of the viewport updates and I doubt they would ship with a broken pager so my guess is that the interface for window updates probably changed slightly. Probably just an extra field or something, but won't know without spending some time investigating. Making good progress on the scheme code so don't really want to divert at this point. As long as the pager works, I'm happy. I don't think we really need any of the other modules. Our winlist stuff is as good as the FvwmWinList so I don't really see the need for it. Our native pager is missing a bunch of features (like interaction with windows/viewports using the pager). - Scott > Yea, I've known this for a while. I've just continued using the old > pager. Do you know if the module interface itself has changed or just > the pager? E.g., do new FvwmWinList modules still work (that was > the only other fvwm module that I used with Scwm). > > Thanks, > Greg > > > Scott Lenser <sl...@cs...> writes: > > > Bad news. > > > > The newest version of the fvwm pager (2.4.x) breaks our compatibility > > layer. It prevents it from displaying windows. The old version > > from 2.2.x works fine. > > > > Probably is just a minor change but need to determine what the change > > is a find out if there is a way to autodetect which version of the > > pager is being used. > > > > - Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Scwm-devs mailing list > Scw...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scwm-devs |