Re: [scribes-discussion] Two ideas for features

[Mystilleef <mys...@gm...>]

One could easily write a plugin for Par. Or one could just enhance the
current paragraph plugin to make it more sophisticated. I think
plugins designed for scribes would provide a better and coherent
experience than piping together random external programs. Maybe a
general pipe plugins could be used temporarily until a specialized
plugin is writing for the operation the user wants to perform.

2009/5/24 Steffen Klemer <mo...@gm...>:
> Am So, 24.05.2009 um 16:41 schrieb Mystilleef <mys...@gm...>:
>
>> I'm open to this idea. I prefer a plugin that performs this operation
>> however.
>
> A general "pipe through"-plugin, or a "par"-plugin?
>
> bye
> /Steffen
>
> --
>  /"\
>  \ /  ASCII Ribbon Campaign    |  "The best way to predict
>  X  * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail   | the future is to invent it."
>  / \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail|                -- Alan Kay
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
> iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com
> _______________________________________________
> scribes-discussion mailing list
> scr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scribes-discussion
>