Re: [scribes-discussion] Two ideas for features
Brought to you by:
mystilleef
|
From: Mystilleef <mys...@gm...> - 2009-05-24 20:53:20
|
One could easily write a plugin for Par. Or one could just enhance the current paragraph plugin to make it more sophisticated. I think plugins designed for scribes would provide a better and coherent experience than piping together random external programs. Maybe a general pipe plugins could be used temporarily until a specialized plugin is writing for the operation the user wants to perform. 2009/5/24 Steffen Klemer <mo...@gm...>: > Am So, 24.05.2009 um 16:41 schrieb Mystilleef <mys...@gm...>: > >> I'm open to this idea. I prefer a plugin that performs this operation >> however. > > A general "pipe through"-plugin, or a "par"-plugin? > > bye > /Steffen > > -- > /"\ > \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | "The best way to predict > X * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | the future is to invent it." > / \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail| -- Alan Kay > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & > iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com > _______________________________________________ > scribes-discussion mailing list > scr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scribes-discussion > |