From: Gregory S. <sha...@gm...> - 2017-11-29 23:44:45
|
Hi Joe, just to be sure: which Scipion version are you using? One of the ways to to this is to use scipion subset protocol with intersection option: 1) first input will be your all dose-weighted mics (full set) 2) second input will be a set of mics (small one) This will get you a dose-weighted subset of mics that you can use for particle extraction (provide there either CTF subset or full CTF set, it should work both ways). Best regards, Grigory -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grigory Sharov, Ph.D. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK. tel. +44 (0) 1223 267542 <+44%201223%20267542> e-mail: gs...@mr... On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Joseph Lyons <ly...@mb...> wrote: > Hi all, > > > I have a data set comprised of dose-weighted and non-dose-weighted > micrographs. CTF estimation was performed on the non-dose-weighted group > and I have selected a set of micrographs from this set based on CTF. > > > The problem arises when I want to extract particles from the dose weighted > set and assign the CTF from the smaller set to this process. > > > When I use the smaller CTF set - it complains of missing CTF based on > micName or micId. I was told that this would just allow particle extraction > from the micrographs common to both the DW and CTF sets. Am I missing > something? > > > Best, > > > Joe > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > scipion-users mailing list > sci...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scipion-users > > |