From: Jose M. de la R. T. <del...@gm...> - 2017-08-09 20:58:34
|
Ok, I'm sorry, I think I confused this protocol with another one. I will try to reproduce you same workflow to verify what is happening. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:53 PM, David Belnap <db...@co...> wrote: > Jose Miguel, > > I don’t get another SetOfMicrographs from the ‘ctf - assign’ protocol I > ran. See attached picture. (The name for the green box underneath the > ‘Protocol Run’ window is ‘import micrographs dose weighted’.) > > David > > > On Aug 9, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Jose Miguel de la Rosa Trevin < > del...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi David, > > I think that after the 'ctf - assign' protocol both SetOfCTF and > SetOfMicrographs are created. The resulting micrographs are the one that > have been "linked" to CTF info. Have you used those one in the protocol > 'xmipp - particle extraction' ? (you can select Micrographs source "Other" > and provide those ones). > > Hope this helps, > Jose Miguel > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:19 PM, David Belnap <db...@co...> > wrote: > >> I have a new data set made up of dose-weighted and non-dose-weighted >> micrographs. I did CTF estimation from the non-dose-weighted group and >> selected the best micrographs from that set and then used CTF assign to >> assign CTFs to the dose-weighted group. After selecting particles, I am >> ready to extract them. But, when I use “xmipp3 extract particles”, I don’t >> see any CTF object in the selection window. I do see the particle >> coordinates in that selection window. I’ve attached images. >> >> Thanks. >> >> David >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> scipion-users mailing list >> sci...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scipion-users >> >> > |