"Alt + Shift + KEY" is a very common usage among
Traditional Chinese users.
For example,
"Alt + Shift + ," will output a double wide comma ",".
"Alt + Shift + ." will output a double wide dot "‧".
"Alt + Shift + o", "。".
"Alt + Shift + ;", ";".
Those hot keys are functional even when the IM is not
invoked.
That is to say, you may input those symbols/phrases
when typing English. (You do not have to press Ctrl +
Space to use this feature.)
This feature is very useful when inputing a
total-Chinese article.
This feature was established initially by ETen Chinese
System, which is the most popular Traditional Chinese
System under DOS.
This feature has been ported to xcin and gcin, both are
popular IM under U*ix.
This feature is highly customized. Users may edit his
or hers own phrase table, which has all the KEY
definitions.
For example, this is the phrase table of gcin:
a ├
#A a
b 股份有限公司
#B b
c ┘
#C c
d ┤
e ┐
f 『
g 』
h 「
i 、
j 」
k §
l │
m ─
n 有限公司
o 。
p ?
/ ?
q ┌
r □
s ┼
t 台北市
u ±
v ˇ
w ┬
x ┴
y 臺灣
z └
, ,
. ‧
; ;
[ 【
] 】
` 反引
1 key1
2 key2
- 減
= 等
\ 反斜
' 引
kp0 ─
Kp0 ═
kp. │
Kp. ║
kp1 └
Kp1 ╚
kp2 ┴
Kp2 ╩
kp3 ┘
Kp3 ╝
kp4 ├
Kp4 ╠
kp5 ┼
Kp5 ╬
kp6 ┤
Kp6 ╣
kp7 ┌
Kp7 ╔
kp8 ┬
Kp8 ╦
kp9 ┐
Kp9 ╗
k_ins ─
k_del │
k_end └
k_down ┴
k_pgdn ┘
k_left ├
k_5 ┼
k_right ┤
k_home ┌
k_up ┬
k_pgup ┐
# f1-f12 皆可用
f1 A test
f2 測試
Logged In: YES
user_id=600121
which imengine do you use?
if you are talking about scim-tables, then you can add your
own phrase
as to the hotkeys, suzhe will comment on that
Logged In: YES
user_id=600121
please update the Category field accordingly
Logged In: YES
user_id=13130
He is talking about the global hotkeys, just like the
hotkeys to switch among IMEngines. He wants a set of hotkeys
to input something to client directly.
I think it's reasonable to add such functionality into
libscim and each FrontEnds, like adding IMEngineHotkeys.
However I'm still thinking which is the best way to add such
feature.
Logged In: YES
user_id=600121
Ok, I understand now
I agree, this is useful
I mentioned adding hotkey surpport to property
(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=11722006).
I think this should also be taken into account.
Here are some requirements I can come up with which the
global hotkeys mechanism should meet:
1. capable of detecting hotkey conflicts and issuing a warning
2... currently, only the above one...