Hello Steve,
Yes Im in the scid list too and I was reading the discussion...
Well Im a dev too, so for me the most easy easy way for the merge is:
- isolate the actual outdated scid code and stop his couter in 4.3 (?)
- create new merge main thread scid+scidvspc with new counter 5.0
(maybe?)
I think your code can retake the name SCID because its a fork and most
zero bug code. And in the website create a note about the historical
development of the code. With the daily use the users will forget the
old SCID or they can fork the 4.3 version...thats the opensource world!
Do the inverse: add the patches to the main scid line will take a lot
of time more, more hands involved in the merge (I think the project
cant allow that) and we cant see progress in some time...
My suggestions and sorry for my english...
Saludos / Best regards
Mario Lacunza
Email:: mla...@gm...
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Google Talk / Y! messenger / Skype: mlacunzav
MSN: mla...@ho...
El jue 14 mar 2013 05:04:18 PET, Steve A escribió:
> If you're not on the Scid mailing list - Alex (current Scid project
> head) has asked me about merging the two projects,
> and perhaps it will happen.
>
> The gest of it is - I will take ScidvsPC source to Scid.sf.net, do a
> heap of doco/code renames, and add to it a window docking feature.
>
> There is a little bit of discussion on that mailing list. You can read
> it all here if you're interested.
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=scid-users
>
> Mario Lacunza <mla...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> Ok I can install the software with no problems...
>>
>> first impressions: well I'll need to re work with no dock windows :)
>> and its much faster than scid!!
>
> If we move to Scid.sf.net (and perhaps anyway), i will port the window
> docking feature shortly. It is a popular thing.
>
> Steve
>
|
