Re: [Scidvspc-users] July news

[Steve A <ste...@gm...>]

Steven wrote
> > I should also mention, recent Scid git versions have been messing  with
the databse backend and (specifically) name frequencies. It's probably best
not to use Scid git for major database work without backing up your
databases, as name corruption is possible, and there is also a lot of
untested code.

Fulvio wrote
> This is simply not true.

Sorry Fulvio, but it is true. You are writing some interesting code, but
Gregor has shown you that recent changes you have made to the name
frequency calculation make it *possible* to break database names if a base
is worked on in Scid git, then reloaded in Scid 4.3 4.5 or Scid vs PC.

Steven