Re: [Scidvspc-users] Scid vs PC 4.9

[Steve A <ste...@gm...>]

Ok, maybe I have fixed my Windows ntdll.dll issue.
The three new release candidates are uploaded today.
If you're in doubt if you have the latest version, the new MD5 sums are
2a0d64db46b9932a24c5c9d5096627a2  scid_vs_pc-4.9.tgz
3757f0c4a8545dc97bac12dd80f3844b   ScidvsMac-4.9.dmg
9e926c9e451561c9c02ec47706e63d8f  Scid vs PC-4.9.exe
cheers.



On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Alan Whiteman <a.c...@gm...>wrote:

> On 04/15/2013 07:34 AM, Alan Whiteman wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2013 12:06 AM, Steve A wrote:
>>
>>> Yes - i'll update this page when i'm happy i wont be changing the files.
>>>
>>> > Would it be possible to add an additional window just for databases?
>>>
>>> Hmmm... Now we have docked windows it is ok to have a stand alone DB
>>> switcher. But i doubt i'll change it back... For non-docked mode, the stand
>>> alone switcher is very annoying.
>>>
>>> S.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I can see how the non-docked db switcher window can be annoying. But at
>> the same time, the inflexible db switcher can be rather limiting if you are
>> working with multiple databases.
>>
>> Could you perhaps accommodate *both*? Maybe have your normal design for
>> docked and non-docked modes, but allow a secondary 'db switcher' option
>> under the 'windows' menu.
>>
>> This way users could bring up the switcher window, if necessary, in those
>> instances where multiple dbs are in use.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>
>
> Another option that just occurred to me: Why not expand the default
> database area, below the game list, to 3 rows? This way you could haveroom
> for at least 9 open databases. Just a thought.
>
> Alan
>